Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-22-2014, 01:04 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,803 posts, read 41,031,367 times
Reputation: 62204

Advertisements

"Attkisson said, “I called CDC not long ago and I said how many cases are being monitored in the United States and they said 1,400. I said, ‘Where are these updates on your website? ‘ They said they’re not putting it on the web."

Attkisson: CDC Hiding Numbers of Possible Ebola Cases in US - Breitbart

The question to you is "Should they?"

Please don't turn this into an Ebola major or minor scare thread. The thread is whether the CDC should inform the public of the number of potential cases they are monitoring.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-25-2014, 03:10 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,111 posts, read 41,292,919 times
Reputation: 45175
There is no reason to make the number public. It would just be something for the media to use to propagate more Ebola hysteria.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2014, 03:12 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,231,797 times
Reputation: 17209
Someone is trying very hard to pry millions of dollars worth of funding out of the politicians and not having a very good go of it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2014, 04:05 PM
 
Location: Stasis
15,823 posts, read 12,471,721 times
Reputation: 8599
She's a conspiracy nut.
Sharyl Attkisson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In October 2014, just before the publication of her book, Attkisson released a video that she said corroborated her allegations of having her computer hacked.[27]

However, some liberal commentators and security experts have suggested that the video appears only to show that the delete key or the backspace key on her keyboard was stuck.[28]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2014, 04:49 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,369,310 times
Reputation: 7990
Quote:
Originally Posted by katzpaw View Post
She's a conspiracy nut.
Sharyl Attkisson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In October 2014, just before the publication of her book, Attkisson released a video that she said corroborated her allegations of having her computer hacked.[27]

However, some liberal commentators and security experts have suggested that the video appears only to show that the delete key or the backspace key on her keyboard was stuck.[28]
The 'experts' referenced in your Wikipedia link evidently made their diagnosis only by watching a video of her computer screen that Attkisson took with her cell phone and posted online. That's absurd. You can't make a diagnosis like that by watching a video of the screen. You'd have to get physical access to the machine and take apart the keyboard to know if there was a stuck key. Here is a much better link on the story:
Sharyl Attkisson’s computer intrusions: ‘Worse than anything Nixon ever did’ - The Washington Post

This guy actually had access to her computer in order to diagnose what was going on.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Washington Post
So CBS News hires an independent computer analyst whom Attkisson identifies as “Jerry Patel,” also a pseudonym. He finds a massive amount of suspicious activity in the computer, including the removal of all kinds of log messages. ... ‘In my professional opinion, someone has accessed this box … I see evidence that shows a deliberate and skilled attempt to clean the log files of activity.’” Intrusions of this caliber, concludes “Patel,” are “far beyond the the abilities of even the best nongovernment hackers.”
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2014, 04:50 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,384,355 times
Reputation: 17261
Good lord. this is a perfect example of why Breitbart links are so worthless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2014, 04:59 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,369,310 times
Reputation: 7990
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC View Post
"Attkisson said, “I called CDC not long ago and I said how many cases are being monitored in the United States and they said 1,400. I said, ‘Where are these updates on your website? ‘ They said they’re not putting it on the web."

Attkisson: CDC Hiding Numbers of Possible Ebola Cases in US - Breitbart

The question to you is "Should they?"

Please don't turn this into an Ebola major or minor scare thread. The thread is whether the CDC should inform the public of the number of potential cases they are monitoring.
So back on topic, the obvious answer is yes. A big part of the initial mishandling by the CDC was miscommunications and apparent conflicting statements that created mistrust and suspicion.

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/20141...ergency-part-2
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2014, 05:06 PM
 
Location: Stasis
15,823 posts, read 12,471,721 times
Reputation: 8599
Do you really believe there are about 1,400 Ebola cases in the US? This and a chem-trails post. The conspiracy nuts are active today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2014, 05:36 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,369,310 times
Reputation: 7990
Quote:
Originally Posted by katzpaw View Post
Do you really believe there are about 1,400 Ebola cases in the US? This and a chem-trails post. The conspiracy nuts are active today.
You missed the OP's point. The point is that the CDC should be posting its info on an accurate and timely basis. I imagine that if there are 1400 being monitored, it is probably related to the flights on which an infected person was a passenger. On the Frontier flight there were 132 passengers. The 132 get off the plane and have contact with 10 others, and now you have 13,332 people to monitor. It doesn't mean even one of them are infected. It just means that there's a possibility of infection.
Frontier Airlines Looks For Additional Passengers on Plane After Ebola-Infected Nurse's Flight - ABC News
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2014, 06:14 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,765,593 times
Reputation: 20674
Once the midterms concluded, politicians and the media lost interest in Ebola fear monguring.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:24 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top