Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 09-26-2014, 11:59 PM
 
433 posts, read 291,273 times
Reputation: 87

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper 88 View Post
Just a wild guess, but maybe it's comments like this that have something to do with it....
Hey lets not be coy, that is main reason of and for the 2nd Amendment, to prevent tyranny in America...

But I should rephrase that.

 
Old 09-27-2014, 12:01 AM
 
Location: in my imagination
13,607 posts, read 21,410,739 times
Reputation: 10112
No surprise.

Anti gun people want to...

ban a semi auto because it too fast
ban a "saturday night special" because its too cheap
ban a pocket pistol because its to concealable
ban a "assault rifle" because its too scary
ban a .50BMG rifle because its too big
ban a drum feed shotgun because its shoots too much lead
ban a accessory because it makes it too easy
hell they want to ban lead bullets, but then hollow point also

fact is they just want to ban guns period and find any excuse to do so
 
Old 09-27-2014, 12:09 AM
 
433 posts, read 291,273 times
Reputation: 87
Quote:
Originally Posted by lionking View Post
No surprise.

Anti gun people want to...

ban a semi auto because it too fast
ban a "saturday night special" because its too cheap
ban a pocket pistol because its to concealable
ban a "assault rifle" because its too scary
ban a .50BMG rifle because its too big
ban a drum feed shotgun because its shoots too much lead
ban a accessory because it makes it too easy
hell they want to ban lead bullets, but then hollow point also

fact is they just want to ban guns period and find any excuse to do so
They want to ban a suppressors because they are too quite..

They want to ban lead ammo because its a "pollutant" but will not allow copper or brass because they lie and say they are "armor piercing" when it is not.

They never stop, and we will not stop fighting them, and destorying them with facts, logic, and reality.
 
Old 09-27-2014, 12:15 AM
 
Location: Top of the South, NZ
22,216 posts, read 21,712,093 times
Reputation: 7608
Pretty lame for hunting.

Good technology though.
 
Old 09-27-2014, 12:33 AM
 
433 posts, read 291,273 times
Reputation: 87
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe90 View Post
Pretty lame for hunting.

Good technology though.
"pretty lame for hunting"...When you miss a shot, and you have spend days tracking game only to go home empty handed I want you remember what you just said...

If it works, well it is not lame is it?
 
Old 09-27-2014, 12:37 AM
 
Location: Top of the South, NZ
22,216 posts, read 21,712,093 times
Reputation: 7608
Quote:
Originally Posted by Liberty Above All Else View Post
"pretty lame for hunting"...When you miss a shot, and you have spend days tracking game only to go home empty handed I want you remember what you just said...

If it works, well it is not lame is it?
Shouldn't be taking shots if you're going to miss.
 
Old 09-27-2014, 01:08 AM
 
433 posts, read 291,273 times
Reputation: 87
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe90 View Post
Shouldn't be taking shots if you're going to miss.
No one takes a shot if their think they are going to miss....
 
Old 09-27-2014, 01:14 AM
 
Location: Top of the South, NZ
22,216 posts, read 21,712,093 times
Reputation: 7608
Quote:
Originally Posted by Liberty Above All Else View Post
No one takes a shot if their think they are going to miss....
No, but they should not take a shot, if they think they might miss.
 
Old 09-27-2014, 01:54 AM
 
Location: Texas Hill Country
23,652 posts, read 14,033,266 times
Reputation: 18861
Well, which would one rather have (yes, I know, the real purpose has already been covered): people who accurate putting their rounds where they mean or people not so accurate, perhaps causing a greater innocent bystander risk?

Or, for that matter, on the bad side, people doing a clean kill or those making an "Ironside" out of it?
 
Old 09-27-2014, 02:38 AM
 
433 posts, read 291,273 times
Reputation: 87
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe90 View Post
No, but they should not take a shot, if they think they might miss.
You miss 100% of the shots you dont take.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:37 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top