Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What years of schooling did Albert Einstein go through to become the scientist he became..
High School in Aargau, Switzerland, followed by a 4-year degree in mathematics & physics at the Zürich Polytechnic, a 2-year break from academics and then a PhD from the University of Zürich.
Quote:
ooh he dropped out in 7th grade, so I guess he wasnt a "real" scientist to you..
You people really do believe the most idiotic things.
No, that was an opinion. I don't know why you thought it was a fact.
So now its an opinion.. fine, lets go with that..
Opinion: a view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge:
So your view or judgment is formed on global warming, not necessarily based upon fact or knowledge.. Well if you admit you have no knowledge on the subject, then why do you keep commenting on it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78
Funny, you just said the exact same thing I said. Coleman needs to prove what he is saying if he wishes it to be considered as fact, but until then it is just an opinion from a hack journalist and he is wrong.
I made no such statement to agree with you. Coleman isnt here for me to question how he came to the conclusion he came to, I questioned how you are so dam sure he made no attempt to research his position, especially you just stated your stating an opinion, not based upon a dam thing, and thus you are doing nothing but wasting everyones time..
High School in Aargau, Switzerland, followed by a 4-year degree in mathematics & physics at the Zürich Polytechnic, a 2-year break from academics and then a PhD from the University of Zürich.
You people really do believe the most idiotic things.
Thanks for that post, I was wondering if he was going to figure that one out.
Yes, I was saying he is wrong, and he hasn't provided any data to prove that he is right.
And, no AGW promoter has ever provided any data to prove their AGW theory, either.
But, funny how you didn't use that standard just a few posts back. In fact, you quite obviously implied that just being 'scientist' was enough to make someone credible - and from the tenor of your posts - pretty much "infallible".
Quote:
Actually their statements are related to the research they conduct, quite the difference.
In reality, I watched a slightly longer than 30 minute video of Mr Coleman, where it becomes obvious he HAS quite extensively studied the genesis of the theory of AGW, and why the "science" isn't science and never will be.
Opinion: a view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge:
So your view or judgment is formed on global warming, not necessarily based upon fact or knowledge.. Well if you admit you have no knowledge on the subject, then why do you keep commenting on it?
I made no such statement to agree with you. Coleman isnt here for me to question how he came to the conclusion he came to, I questioned how you are so dam sure he made no attempt to research his position, especially you just stated your stating an opinion, not based upon a dam thing, and thus you are doing nothing but wasting everyones time..
So that gives Coleman a pass to question him about how he came to his opinion that he expects people to accept as a fact? Maybe you should start questioning Coleman rather than giving him a pass.
"ooh he dropped out in 7th grade, so I guess he wasnt a "real" scientist to you.."
That is your opinion.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.