Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-07-2014, 06:28 AM
 
26,512 posts, read 15,092,794 times
Reputation: 14673

Advertisements

Walker says Wisconsin

Coming to a shore town near you? Inside New Jersey's pension crisis

No shortfall in Wisconsin, the only state that can say so. I know that Wisconsin made controversial decisions to make employees increase their contributions to fund the pension that they want. However, Wisconsin workers know it will be there, Illinois, their neighbor to the south has a 60% funding shortfall.

It is not impossible that Illinois will wind up like Detroit - retirees finding out in retirement that they will be getting a pension pay cut. If I were a Wisconsin state employee I would feel more at ease knowing that the pension will be there.

We need adults making adult decisions rather than promising us fairy tales.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-07-2014, 06:34 AM
 
2,499 posts, read 2,628,114 times
Reputation: 1789
NJ did the sames things Wisconsin did - except for 1 the employer still did not make their contribution of 4% of an employees salary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2014, 06:36 AM
 
Location: Eastern UP of Michigan
1,204 posts, read 873,549 times
Reputation: 1292
Did you read the whole article, it has been fully funded at +99% since 2003.

Good for them that they make changes as needed etc. to maintain a good thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2014, 06:51 AM
 
26,512 posts, read 15,092,794 times
Reputation: 14673
Quote:
Originally Posted by tom1944 View Post
NJ did the sames things Wisconsin did - except for 1 the employer still did not make their contribution of 4% of an employees salary.
No. New Jersey did not do the same things that Wisconsin has done.

New Jersey pays out $4.9 Billion a year and collects less than $0.9 Billion a year. If your numbers on the previous thread are correct - the employer could contribute 38% and there would still be an annual deficit with the NJ pension.

Wisconsin has had a respectable pension for some time now and they make adult decisions to keep it that way (ie teachers go from making no contributions to making some contributions). New Jersey has had a problem slowly festering for decades that is about to blow up if nothing is done.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2014, 06:57 AM
 
Location: NJ
23,566 posts, read 17,245,407 times
Reputation: 17615
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon View Post
No. New Jersey did not do the same things that Wisconsin has done.

New Jersey pays out $4.9 Billion a year and collects less than $0.9 Billion a year. If your numbers on the previous thread are correct - the employer could contribute 38% and there would still be an annual deficit with the NJ pension.

Wisconsin has had a respectable pension for some time now and they make adult decisions to keep it that way (ie teachers go from making no contributions to making some contributions). New Jersey has had a problem slowly festering for decades that is about to blow up if nothing is done.
You would have thought with the election of gov jon corzine the financial guru blessed and quoted by obama, biden and HRC, NJ's financial house would have been put in order.....apparently not. So if Superman Jon Corzine can't save NJ, who can? I know, let's blame Chris Christie for decades of pension abuse!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2014, 07:31 AM
 
2,499 posts, read 2,628,114 times
Reputation: 1789
Corzine raised the age you can retire, capped the amount pensions could be based on to the social security income limit and increased the penalty for early retiement.

Christie raised the level of the employees contribution. He raised the retirement age again.

What they both failed to do is contribute the employer portion of the formula. 4% of an employees salary.

So in NJ employees did the same thing as Wisconsin employees but our governors did not.

I have not blamed Christie over any of the other governors but I will correct him when he blames unions and the worker.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2014, 07:34 AM
 
2,499 posts, read 2,628,114 times
Reputation: 1789
michiganmoon- NJ employees have always contributed to the pension

The issue you are forgetting is the accumulation of the payments that were missed for the past 20+ years. Those missed payments are the reason for the amount being paid out being much larger than the amount coming in. The employer needs to make up for all those years missed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2014, 07:44 AM
 
Location: Salisbury,NC
16,759 posts, read 8,223,014 times
Reputation: 8537
IT started with Gov. Whitman and was helped along with MBS and the Bush Depression. Overall the State Govt failed to fund at the level required. Which overall has helped NJ to have some of the highest Real Estate taxes (Christie promised to lower and failed) in the country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2014, 07:48 AM
 
Location: Salisbury,NC
16,759 posts, read 8,223,014 times
Reputation: 8537
Second thread about this is, Moon planning on working for Walker for Pres.?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-07-2014, 07:49 AM
 
2,499 posts, read 2,628,114 times
Reputation: 1789
For over 20 years there was zero dollars contributed to the pension by the State. Zero means that the pension had no impact on taxes in NJ but we have a governor who leads the public to believe that NJ's high taxes are due to the pension. Even now the State pension contibution is less than 1% of the State budget and all the local Board of Education budgets that cover the employees for those pensions.

Can someone explain to me how pensions drive the taxes?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:37 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top