Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
NOT injecting vaccines is also shooting craps....but with much worse odds for you and everyone around you.
Heroin addicts even know they'd rather take a 1 in 100,000 odds of getting sick (or worse), compared to the older generations that faced a 1 in 100 odds of getting sick, and a 1 in 1,000 odds of dying.
Are you sure it is the vaccines causing the autism and not the chem trails?
I think it's riding in cars that's causing the autism. After all, the incidence has increased as car ownership has increased. Correlation = causation. (Sarc)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mm4
Almost no Amish/Mennonite populations were until they were increasingly integrated into the same programs.
_"Co-Author of Lancet MMR-Autism Study Exonerated on All Charges of Professional Misconduct"_
"Dr. John Walker-Smith, considered the father of pediatric gastroenterology, has today been restored to his much-deserved reputation of high esteem. His appeal of the U.K. General Medical Council’s 2010 decision to remove his license for serious professional misconduct has been quashed in its entirety. This decision raises questions about the validity of the 2010 GMC proceeding in general.
"The GMC proceeding was a multi-year, multi-million dollar prosecution against Drs. Wakefield, Walker-Smith, and Murch. It related to a controversial 1998 study published in The Lancet suggesting a possible link between autism, the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine and bowel disease. Based on the GMC prosecution, both Drs. Walker-Smith and Wakefield lost their licenses to practice and the Lancet article was officially retracted. The GMC alleged that the physician-authors had failed to obtain necessary ethical clearances and that they had subjected the twelve children in the study to unnecessary medical procedures.
"Justice Mitting, reviewing Dr. Walker-Smith’s appeal in the High Court of Justice, Queen’s Bench Division, Administrative Court, found that the GMC’s conclusions were “based on inadequate and superficial reasoning” and that “the finding of serious professional misconduct and the sanction of erasure are both quashed.” See full text of the decision.
"Dr. Walker-Smith’s professional insurance coverage paid for his appeal; Dr. Wakefield’s insurance carrier would not.
"Dr. Wakefield has recently filed a defamation lawsuit in Texas against the British Medical Journal, Dr. Fiona Godlee, Editor-in-Chief, and journalist Brian Deer, who instigated the GMC prosecution. His lawsuit alleges that the defendants knowingly or recklessly engaged in fraudulent misrepresentations about 1998 Lancet study. While far from decisive, the Mitting ruling bodes well for Dr. Wakefield’s defamation action."
"The series of articles launched Wednesday are investigative journalism, not results of a clinical study. The writer, Brian Deer, said Wakefield "chiseled" the data before him, "falsifying medical histories of children and essentially concocting a picture, which was the picture he was contracted to find by lawyers hoping to sue vaccine manufacturers and to create a vaccine scare.
According to BMJ, Wakefield received more than 435,000 pounds ($674,000) from the lawyers. Godlee said the study shows that of the 12 cases Wakefield examined in his paper, five showed developmental problems before receiving the MMR vaccine and three never had autism."
Payola. He was PAID to falsify research that not even he can replicate, that fails the scientific method, fails peer review and is blatantly untrue.
CNN also has a bad habit of deceptively Chroma Keying from locations where it isn't. Here's one of the more notorious examples of that:
Why do people get so hung up on what one doctor says versus the majority.
Wakefield is a quack and completely discredited.
People who believe him are stupid.
And I hate stupid.
The "majority" is usually wrong.
Science has proven that time and time again.
The consensus is more often than not, absensical.
It is much easier to control a group, with all its members feeding on itself, than to control an individual.
Last edited by Hyperthetic; 04-08-2015 at 02:04 PM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
