Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-19-2015, 04:21 PM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,558 posts, read 37,155,629 times
Reputation: 14016

Advertisements

Many scientists are working on solutions and this one looks promising...

Researchers have found a way to pluck carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and turn it into a useful product – carbon nanofibers. They say, using their method across an area 10% the size of the Sahara Desert, enough CO2 could be removed to decrease atmospheric levels below pre-Industrial Revolution levels within 10 years. The research was presented at a meeting of the American Chemical Society (ACS) in Boston this week, and published online in Nano Letters.

Turning Atmospheric CO2 Into Carbon Nanofibers Could Reduce Global Warming | IFLScience
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-19-2015, 04:30 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,827,388 times
Reputation: 6509
Global warming is preventing the next ice age.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2015, 04:31 PM
 
27,657 posts, read 16,147,064 times
Reputation: 19081
awsome... guess we wont be hearing about global/climate change anymore
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2015, 04:36 PM
 
30,075 posts, read 18,678,343 times
Reputation: 20894
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
Many scientists are working on solutions and this one looks promising...

Researchers have found a way to pluck carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and turn it into a useful product – carbon nanofibers. They say, using their method across an area 10% the size of the Sahara Desert, enough CO2 could be removed to decrease atmospheric levels below pre-Industrial Revolution levels within 10 years. The research was presented at a meeting of the American Chemical Society (ACS) in Boston this week, and published online in Nano Letters.

Turning Atmospheric CO2 Into Carbon Nanofibers Could Reduce Global Warming | IFLScience
There is no correlation between industrial output (man made CO2) and temperature.

ALL OF THESE REMEDIES to combat atmospheric CO2 is :

a. a waste of money
b. harmful to the economy
c. increases unemployment
d. harms the environment (see above)


Again, sanspeur, tell us why global temperatures ROSE during the Great Depression when industrial output fell 60%??????

There appears to be NO CORRELATION BETWEEN INDUSTRIAL OUTPUT (and thus man-made CO2) and temperature. Therefore all of the liberal initiatives to reduce industrial output (and thus CO2) will do NOTHING to affect temperatures, as happened in the Great Depression!

Stop the idiocy of "global warming".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2015, 04:37 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,384,355 times
Reputation: 17261
Dropping some nukes might help as well. (not joking). Or a couple volcanoes.

I completely believe in man made global warming, the evidence is just too clear cut, and theres a ton of it. But I also firmly believe that as our technology increases we will be able to deal with it. The OP's link is an example.

Now should we be careful? Absolutely. But we also shouldn't slow our progress forward either. So I am one of those folks who thinks that doing things to help prevent it from occurring too fast is good, but not so much that we damage our economy or progress.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2015, 04:43 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,384,355 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
There is no correlation between industrial output (man made CO2) and temperature.

ALL OF THESE REMEDIES to combat atmospheric CO2 is :

a. a waste of money
b. harmful to the economy
c. increases unemployment
d. harms the environment (see above)


Again, sanspeur, tell us why global temperatures ROSE during the Great Depression when industrial output fell 60%??????

There appears to be NO CORRELATION BETWEEN INDUSTRIAL OUTPUT (and thus man-made CO2) and temperature. Therefore all of the liberal initiatives to reduce industrial output (and thus CO2) will do NOTHING to affect temperatures, as happened in the Great Depression!

Stop the idiocy of "global warming".
Stop the idiocy of thinking that industrial output is where most CO2 comes from. How much did coal and oil production drop? What? You mean people still used coal? Yeah.

Also stop the idiocy of thinking that if less is used, suddenly POOF its not present anymore.

I could go on. Your entire post is full of incorrect assumptions or knowledge.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2015, 06:05 PM
 
46,307 posts, read 27,124,387 times
Reputation: 11135
We could all stop breathing right....cause what is the main proponent of global warming?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2015, 06:14 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,384,355 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
We could all stop breathing right....cause what is the main proponent of global warming?
primarily fossil fuels. Also Cows rate highly too.

industrial output is a mere 18%
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2015, 06:23 PM
 
Location: Fredericksburg, Va
5,404 posts, read 16,000,620 times
Reputation: 8095
Get rid of the "hot air" in Washington DC....that should do it!

We puny humans have NO effect on global climate. None. Zip. Nada.

Personally, I don't want a cold climate...I LIKE summer! You all seem to forget that the land masses are moving...and that creates a different weather pattern...and will continue to do so forever. I think plate tectonics have more to do with our global climate that CO or CO2 or anything. We can do NOTHING about our continents moving. Learn to adapt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-19-2015, 06:25 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,827,388 times
Reputation: 6509
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
primarily fossil fuels. Also Cows rate highly too.

industrial output is a mere 18%
Composting is actually a large part of global warming.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:14 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top