How does this KY clerk still have a job?? (voters, San Francisco, patriots)

[V8 Vega]

Originally Posted by Northeastah

yeah, we will, tomorrow when she answers to a judge as to why she should NOT be held in contempt of court. she's already being sued by both gay and heterosexual couples. I can only hope they make her life a living hell Couldn't happen to a nicer hypocrite.

There is no hate like the hate from the gay left.

[Mag3.14]

Originally Posted by BentBow

Remember, Force always creates resentment.

Only government can force another man, to do everything against his will, or kill them.
The reason we had the US. Constitution.... To prevent government from using force against it's own people.


A clue for the clueless:
Freedom = Choices
Liberty = The ability to make your own choices.


Eliminate the choices. = government
Eliminate the ability to make that choice. = oppression

Your weird argument is actually an argument for those whose rights are being denied by this clerk.

[BentBow]

Originally Posted by jjrose

The people of the county can't protect her from a judge holding her in contempt of court and having her arrested.

I bet they can. Remember Cliven Bundy.
They can do more than that, when an armed population organizes against oppression.

[mikebnllnb]

Originally Posted by BentBow

Remember, Force always creates resentment.

Only government can force another man, to do everything against his will, or kill them.
The reason we had the US. Constitution.... To prevent government from using force against it's own people.

You are correct but not in the way you think.


This representative of Kentucky is forcing her religious beliefs into a legal matter. I think violating people's Constitutional rights in several different ways is creating resentment.

[Mag3.14]

Originally Posted by BentBow

I bet they can. Remember Cliven Bundy.
They can do more than that, when an armed population organizes against oppression.

I think you need to understand the difference in the need for rules, laws and processes in society, and oppression.

[Cliff Clavin]

Originally Posted by BentBow

I bet they can. Remember Cliven Bundy.
They can do more than that, when an armed population organizes against oppression.

Wouldn't Kim Davis be the oppressor in this scenario?

[BentBow]

Originally Posted by Mag3.14

Your weird argument is actually an argument for those whose rights are being denied by this clerk.

I agree that government needs to get out of the marriage business and giving special treatment to the married men & women, others don't get.

As governments intellectual way, of establishing the family unit of men staying with their women, to raise the children.

[BentBow]

Originally Posted by Cliff Clavin

Wouldn't Kim Davis be the oppressor in this scenario?

No

[mikebnllnb]

Originally Posted by BentBow

No

So you then advocate lawlessness? Or do you prefer a society where the individual gets to pick and choose which laws they wish to follow?

[BentBow]

Originally Posted by jjrose

I don't care for anarchy, sorry. Laws are important when living in a civilized society.

Liberty is a funny thing.

And she is an elected official, just like Scott Walker was, where perceived rights were concerned. RECALL.


Choice = Freedom..... Go to the next county
Choose = Liberty.... having a soulmate, or not having a soulmate.