Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-14-2015, 08:56 PM
 
18,983 posts, read 9,075,608 times
Reputation: 14688

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJboutit View Post
I say this one more time the media is really bias toward Cliton looks like she is going to get the nomination messed up really. Her camping so far has been a bust so far the debates she has been her meh or terible and the media still has her wining she has been the worst candidate in all the debates so far.
You've been listening to bloviating clowns and idiots for so long you don't recognize substance when you hear it. Understandable.

I thought the moderators did a good job tonight.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-14-2015, 08:57 PM
 
Location: The D-M-V area
13,691 posts, read 18,456,585 times
Reputation: 9596
THIS DEBATE WAS A WASH! Pure comedy!

They should have waited a week!

NOTHING WAS LEARNED EXCEPT THAT THEY ARE SEVERELY OUT OF TOUCH!

But we knew that already!


Next!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2015, 08:58 PM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,372 posts, read 9,314,559 times
Reputation: 7364
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJboutit View Post
I say this one more time the media is really bias toward Cliton looks like she is going to get the nomination messed up really. Her camping so far has been a bust so far the debates she has been her meh or terible and the media still has her wining she has been the worst candidate in all the debates so far.
The more you bash her the more it looks like you're afraid she'll walk away with the presidency.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2015, 08:59 PM
 
9,725 posts, read 15,172,833 times
Reputation: 3346
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyGem View Post
I could agree with taxing the 1 to 3% of earners but NOT WITH CUTTING OUR DEFENSE!
They waste trillions of dollars on weapons systems that don't work!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2015, 09:00 PM
 
Location: SE Asia
16,236 posts, read 5,880,554 times
Reputation: 9117
Free health care. How do we pay for it? Raise taxes
Free education. How do we pay for it? Raise taxes
How much can we raise taxes?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2015, 09:00 PM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,372 posts, read 9,314,559 times
Reputation: 7364
Quote:
Originally Posted by LuckyGem View Post
THIS DEBATE WAS A WASH! Pure comedy!

They should have waited a week!

NOTHING WAS LEARNED EXCEPT THAT THEY ARE SEVERELY OUT OF TOUCH!


Next!!!
Out of touch? Why because they didn't talk about building walls and deporting Mexicans?

I learned something. I've narrowed my choice down between two instead of three candidates.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2015, 09:01 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,824,055 times
Reputation: 6509
Quote:
Originally Posted by UB50 View Post
They waste trillions of dollars on weapons systems that don't work!
You really don't know what you are talking about, it is now trillions of dollars.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2015, 09:05 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 24 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,558 posts, read 16,548,014 times
Reputation: 6041
Quote:
Originally Posted by shooting4life View Post
You really don't know what you are talking about, it is now trillions of dollars.
he meant billions. maybe if the defense department didnt have so much money, they wouldnt waste so much.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2015, 09:06 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,824,055 times
Reputation: 6509
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
he meant billions. maybe if the defense department didnt have so much money, they wouldnt waste so much.
Just like the federal government as a whole.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2015, 09:08 PM
 
Location: Taos NM
5,357 posts, read 5,136,516 times
Reputation: 6781
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJboutit View Post
I say this one more time the media is really bias toward Cliton looks like she is going to get the nomination messed up really. Her camping so far has been a bust so far the debates she has been her meh or terible and the media still has her wining she has been the worst candidate in all the debates so far.
Totally agree. I think O'Malley may have started to out her as the moderate candidate.

I do have to say though the Dem debates really are better than the republican ones.

Here's my preferences so far: Sanders>O'Malley>Rand Paul>Clinton... rest are garbage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:41 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top