Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Trump gave $100,000 to the Clinton Foundation and when his newest campaign manager was asked if he paid to play, she blushed and said, "Of course not."
It wasn't correct (in post #24) or even close to it. 88% of their funding goes to programs and 12% for overhead and they have a A rating from Charity Watch.
Charity watch is run by democrats, nice try. That's like asking loretta lynch to be objective on Hillary's crimes. charity navigator is the heavy weight index to measure charities. Charity watch is fooled by slick accounting methods and Hillary is an expert there. Nearly half a BILLION in Hillary's 501(c) "NON profit"
Charity watch is run by democrats, nice try. That's like asking loretta lynch to be objective on Hillary's crimes. charity navigator is the heavy weight index to measure charities. Charity watch is fooled by slick accounting methods and Hillary is an expert there. Nearly half a BILLION in Hillary's 501(c) "NON profit"
Trump gave $100,000 to the Clinton Foundation and when his newest campaign manager was asked if he paid to play, she blushed and said, "Of course not."
She blushed? Sure she did. And is there a reason why you didn't tell us the rest of what she said? She did comment further, except it doesn't suit the liberal partyline.
Trump has said from day one that he donated to both parties.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RCCCB
There was a report in the news, something like 9% to charity.
Yes, I read that too. And the Foundation is set up outside the US to circumvent US laws.
She blushed? Sure she did. And is there a reason why you didn't tell us the rest of what she said? She did comment further, except it doesn't suit the liberal partyline.
Trump has said from day one that he donated to both parties.
Yes, I read that too. And the Foundation is set up outside the US to circumvent US laws.
Is Hillary's foundation really off the grand caymans to avoid taxes or U.S. Laws?
She blushed? Sure she did. And is there a reason why you didn't tell us the rest of what she said? She did comment further, except it doesn't suit the liberal partyline.
Trump has said from day one that he donated to both parties.
Yes, I read that too. And the Foundation is set up outside the US to circumvent US laws.
With today's announcement that the state department won't release Hillary's calendar until after the election, we know they are in the tank for Hillary. Taxpayers lose again...
We must keep on pressing the point and keep the air waves alive on how the Clintons is Racketeering, embezzlement , conflict of interest, How staffers were bring paid by the SD and the Foundation.
Bill and Hil received Salaries from the Clinton Foundation.
Is Hillary's foundation really off the grand caymans to avoid taxes or U.S. Laws?
The nonprofit, the Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership (Canada), operates in parallel to a Clinton Foundation project called the Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership, which is expressly covered by an agreement Mrs. Clinton signed to make all donors public while she led the State Department. However, the foundation maintains that the Canadian partnership is not bound by that agreement and that under Canadian law contributors’ names cannot be made public.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Sure she did. And is there a reason why you didn't tell us the rest of what she said? She did comment further, except it doesn't suit the liberal partyline.
