Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Even considering the current political climate, and the low turnout, what are the possible implications of a wave of female minority leadership in congress (and in the judicial sphere)?
What a loaded question...Listen, it matters to those who are affected by laws/policies put forth by the government. For example, Kamala Harris, as AG of California, was a supporter of both the BLM Movement and Dreamers. She's now a U.S. Senator, granted the make-up of the senate is majority Republican (46-D/ 51-R, 2-I), but it's a narrow margin...
In addition, there were tremendous gains in the judicial sphere...9 Black women were elected Justices in Jefferson County, Alabama alone. That has tremendous implications within the legal community (how cases are resolved). Politics is not only national, in fact it's really the opposite...
Too bad Congress has very little socioeconomic diversity.
Actually, I agree with you...And I say that as a member of a Black bourgeois family. A lack of socioeconomic diversity in government is the reason so many Americans (irregardless of race) feel divorced from the process.
Even considering the current political climate, and the low turnout, what are the possible implications of a wave of female minority leadership in congress (and in the judicial sphere)?
They are mostly puppets of the donor class taking their marching orders from their financial overlords. Thats what matters.
Keep voting!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.