Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-22-2016, 07:48 PM
 
Location: *
13,240 posts, read 4,925,181 times
Reputation: 3461

Advertisements

Trump’s big infrastructure plan? It’s a trap.

Quote:
First, Trump’s plan is not really an infrastructure plan. It’s a tax-cut plan for utility-industry and construction-sector investors, and a massive corporate welfare plan for contractors. The Trump plan doesn’t directly fund new roads, bridges, water systems or airports, as did Hillary Clinton’s 2016 infrastructure proposal. Instead, Trump’s plan provides tax breaks to private-sector investors who back profitable construction projects. These projects (such as electrical grid modernization or energy pipeline expansion) might already be planned or even underway. There’s no requirement that the tax breaks be used for incremental or otherwise expanded construction efforts; they could all go just to fatten the pockets of investors in previously planned projects. ...
How surprising. Another con job.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-22-2016, 07:57 PM
 
45,226 posts, read 26,443,162 times
Reputation: 24982
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiGeekGuest View Post
Trump’s big infrastructure plan? It’s a trap.



How surprising. Another con job.
Link?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2016, 08:01 PM
 
27,624 posts, read 21,125,541 times
Reputation: 11095
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
Link?
I found this...

Quote:
Trump’s Infrastructure ‘Plan’ Is Really Just A Privatization Scam

Trump’s plan does not call for public investment in public infrastructure, nor does it call for hiring local construction companies using American suppliers and creating jobs for American union workers. Trump’ plan is for the government to spend money giving tax breaks to giant, multinational corporations and calling it infrastructure investment. Any actual infrastructure investment that does occur will bring a return on that investment of taxpayer money to a few 1%-ers and not to We the People.

Ronald A. Klain oversaw the team implementing Obama’s 2009 American Recovery and Renewal Act, known as the “Stimulus.” Klain wrote an op-ed appearing in the Washington Post, titled “Trump’s big infrastructure plan? It’s a trap.” Klain explained that the plan isn’t even really even about infrastructure:

https://ourfuture.org/20161121/trump...atization-scam
Read the rest of the article...it is mind-blowing and disgusting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2016, 08:02 PM
 
Location: *
13,240 posts, read 4,925,181 times
Reputation: 3461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
Link?
Sorry about that, here it is:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...fcd_story.html

It's worth noting 'cui bono?'
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2016, 08:06 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiGeekGuest View Post
Trump’s big infrastructure plan? It’s a trap.



How surprising. Another con job.

Ah, The Art of the Spiel.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2016, 08:07 PM
 
Location: *
13,240 posts, read 4,925,181 times
Reputation: 3461
Quote:
Originally Posted by sickofnyc View Post
I found this...



Read the rest of the article...it is mind-blowing and disgusting.
Also a good article which quotes the original, to continue:

Quote:
...Second, as a result of the above, Trump’s plan isn’t really a jobs plan, either. Because the plan subsidizes investors, not projects; because it funds tax breaks, not bridges; because there’s no requirement that the projects be otherwise unfunded, there is simply no guarantee that the plan will produce any net new hiring. Investors may simply shift capital from unsubsidized projects to subsidized ones and pocket the tax breaks on projects they would have funded anyway. Contractors have no obligation to hire new workers, or expand workers’ hours, to collect their $85 billion. ...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2016, 08:08 PM
 
Location: *
13,240 posts, read 4,925,181 times
Reputation: 3461
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
Ah, The Art of the Spiel.
Hah! & so true!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2016, 08:10 PM
 
27,624 posts, read 21,125,541 times
Reputation: 11095
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiGeekGuest View Post
Also a good article which quotes the original, to continue:
I did read it and Randi Rhodes was speaking about this yesterday. How many ways can they screw the American people? I'm more and more disgusted by the people that didn't vote in protest and allowed this crap to go down.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2016, 08:17 PM
 
14,221 posts, read 6,961,631 times
Reputation: 6059
This is a huge scam. Trump should apologize for lying about this "infrastructure plan". Another big money scam on the American taxpayer to benefit his contractor cronies! Enough already!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-22-2016, 08:19 PM
 
Location: *
13,240 posts, read 4,925,181 times
Reputation: 3461
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCALMike View Post
This is a huge scam. Trump should apologize for lying about this "infrastructure plan". Another big money scam on the American taxpayer to benefit his contractor cronies! Enough already!
Additionally (as if necessary ) it highlights the many & diverse 'conflict of interest' issues Mr. Trump is attempting to deflect.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:37 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top