Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-23-2016, 03:58 PM
 
19,640 posts, read 12,231,401 times
Reputation: 26434

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by JerseyGirl415 View Post
Pedophilia itself is NOT a crime... acting on it is.

Pedophilia is the attraction one feels to prepubescent children. Having these thoughts alone is not a crime. We don't make thoughts illegal in the US. There needs to be SOME type of action as well. A pedophile is not a criminal simply for having the attraction but he is if he touches a child inappropriately or possesses child porn, or hurts a child in a worse way.

And no I am not a liberal.

If the thoughts were a crime a lot of people would be in jail. No one is actually saying that.


They want to be some kind of protected class so they can be OUT as a pedo and not face discrimination or "hate" crimes.


They don't really seem to understand how horrible the idea of their child attraction is, to non-pedos. If I were an employer I would want the right not to hire a pedophile even if he or she never molested anyone.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-23-2016, 03:58 PM
 
7,300 posts, read 3,398,309 times
Reputation: 4812
Quote:
Originally Posted by usayit View Post
Oh please..... Leftest wrote the DSM.. not one Right leaning person was involved in writing it? In fact, the entire profession is leftest? You all just call this or that "liberal" (or "conservative" based on what camp you live in) and then use that to discredit and marginalize. That's asinine and goes against all reason. You are no better that the liberals that you all claim make stuff up. WTH is wrong with people on CD-R??? I have very religious conservative friends that are more capable of reason.
Yes, the fields of psychology and sociology are dominated by the far Left. I know because I work within the same sphere. Not everyone in the field is on the Left, but the education promotes Leftist views and there is no way in hades that they would every let right wing perspective influence the DSM authorship.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2016, 04:00 PM
 
Location: NNJ
15,074 posts, read 10,105,001 times
Reputation: 17270
Quote:
Originally Posted by OotsaPootsa View Post
So why'd you bring it up?
What type of question is this?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2016, 04:01 PM
 
Location: NNJ
15,074 posts, read 10,105,001 times
Reputation: 17270
Quote:
Originally Posted by golgi1 View Post
Yes, the fields of psychology and sociology are dominated by the far Left. I know because I work within the same sphere. Not everyone in the field is on the Left, but the education promotes Leftist views and there is no way in hades that they would every let right wing perspective influence the DSM authorship.
Cool story....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2016, 04:01 PM
 
2,405 posts, read 1,446,604 times
Reputation: 1175
Quote:
Originally Posted by usayit View Post
What type of question is this?
It's the kind I'd like to know the answer to, please. Thanks!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2016, 04:02 PM
 
7,300 posts, read 3,398,309 times
Reputation: 4812
Quote:
Originally Posted by OotsaPootsa View Post
Interesting assertions.

Can you you prove them?
Interesting challenge.

Can you prove that you know how to analyze "proof" before you demand it from others and waste their time because you have no personal foundation in evidence analysis?

Your challenge, in light of what I wrote, tells me that you likely can't.

What is your education, exactly? What can you tell me about the standards of evidence? If you can't tell me anything, I'd suggest that you stop posing as a scientist before you end up getting into a debate that you aren't prepared to be in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2016, 04:03 PM
 
7,300 posts, read 3,398,309 times
Reputation: 4812
Quote:
Originally Posted by usayit View Post
Cool story....
Thanks bro... You are a bro, right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2016, 04:03 PM
 
2,405 posts, read 1,446,604 times
Reputation: 1175
Quote:
Originally Posted by golgi1 View Post
Yes, the fields of psychology and sociology are dominated by the far Left.
Is that a fact?

Quote:
Originally Posted by golgi1 View Post
I know because I work within the same sphere.
Uh huh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2016, 04:04 PM
 
12,883 posts, read 13,994,090 times
Reputation: 18451
Quote:
Originally Posted by golgi1 View Post
What you just stated is already understood by the legal system. It doesn't require articles that, as we all know and have before seen, invariably slow walk the populace toward normalization of the behavior.
I didn't read that in the article.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tamajane View Post
If the thoughts were a crime a lot of people would be in jail. No one is actually saying that.


They want to be some kind of protected class so they can be OUT as a pedo and not face discrimination or "hate" crimes.


They don't really seem to understand how horrible the idea of their child attraction is, to non-pedos. If I were an employer I would want the right not to hire a pedophile even if he or she never molested anyone.
People don't deserve to be ostracized from society for things they haven't done.

Last edited by JerseyGirl415; 11-23-2016 at 04:17 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-23-2016, 04:05 PM
 
2,405 posts, read 1,446,604 times
Reputation: 1175
Quote:
Originally Posted by golgi1 View Post
Interesting challenge. Can you prove that you know how to analyze "proof" before you demand it from others and waste their time because you have no personal foundation in evidence analysis? Your challenge, in light of what I wrote, tells me that you likely can't. What is your education, exactly? What can you tell me about the standards of evidence? If you can't tell me anything, I'd suggest that you stop posing as a scientist before you end up getting into a debate that you aren't prepared to be in.
Does this mean that you have no proof to offer, and posted an opinion in a manner that misrepresented it as fact?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:16 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top