Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-28-2016, 07:22 PM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,464,007 times
Reputation: 9074

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Secchamps98 View Post
Are you not happy that those who thought they were going to receive more Govt benefits from more income redistribution has died down? Folks who cried, "pay your fair share" couldn't even define fair share. My version, payment of taxes to cover my portion of govt expenses. I could even go for a base rate, and then an a la carte service for extra benefits I wanted...but the govt could never figure out to make that work. So I would be fine for everyone paying 15-20%, with a specific amount of income exempt for low wage earners. Looks like Trump is proposing 3 different rates, with different deduction amounts. None the less, I am just happy that we don't have to listen to the whiners asking for more money to pay for college tuition, pre-K education and the such. Is it too optimistic to balance the budget and stop having yearly deficits...

Fair share = flat income tax rate on all discretionary income (defined as income above the 20th percentile according to Consumer Expenditure Survey data) above poverty level.

Defined for you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-28-2016, 07:25 PM
 
21,989 posts, read 15,716,760 times
Reputation: 12943
Someone in another thread said flyover country just gave the West Coast a big tax cut while also losing their own health coverage. That's about how I see it. The wealth redistribution appears to be the middle of the country wanting a handout while the coasts are doing just fine. This election did serve to clarify that. So as some on the West Coast, thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2016, 07:48 PM
 
5,756 posts, read 3,999,109 times
Reputation: 2308
Now if you could get them to shut up about Transparency we might get somewhere...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-28-2016, 07:50 PM
 
979 posts, read 490,995 times
Reputation: 386
I expect to see plenty of tax cuts for the rich while the rest of us foot the bill, it is going to be an interesting four years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:47 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top