Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-14-2017, 01:45 PM
 
6,940 posts, read 9,694,167 times
Reputation: 3153

Advertisements

Tell me how mass population leads to Malthusian results again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-14-2017, 01:50 PM
 
Location: London
12,275 posts, read 7,158,578 times
Reputation: 13661
Quote:
Originally Posted by knowledgeiskey View Post
Tell me how mass population leads to Malthusian results again.
The US is geographically huge though, with an abundance of natural resources. It is a very low density country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2017, 01:50 PM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,433,258 times
Reputation: 4190
Quote:
Originally Posted by knowledgeiskey View Post
Tell me how mass population leads to Malthusian results again.

Just put some dictators or commies in charge.

In a capitalistic society where people are free to innovate and reap rewards it can't happen.


This is pretty basic stuff.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2017, 03:46 PM
 
Location: The Woods
18,359 posts, read 26,537,089 times
Reputation: 11351
Wait till petroleum gets scarcer and the fertilizers aren't there to grow the crops required for the population.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2017, 03:57 PM
 
435 posts, read 432,884 times
Reputation: 511
Actually the US ranks 176th in population density.

Population density - Country Comparison
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2017, 05:03 PM
 
7,300 posts, read 3,406,268 times
Reputation: 4812
The US's population density really should only be counted to include the land mass where most people live. A large portion of the USA is essentially uninhabitable for a variety of reasons (law, water, terrain, etc.), and this uninhabitable land throws the calculation off. Include farm land, but don't include low most low desert land, mountain ranges, federal land, etc. Just my opinion.

Anyway, I think that it's due to a variety of factors to include:

high population
a lot of natural resources
a relatively high IQ population
a heritage of European cultures that were historically conducive to civilization building
a lot of land area for industry and farming
a strong university tradition
a developed banking infrastructure
relatively effective, relatively low corruption law and order
corruption that isn't the lowest in the world, but not the highest either
World dominance through imperialism (not pc, but true both in terms of it being factual and in terms of its productive effect)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2017, 05:16 PM
 
22,923 posts, read 15,523,153 times
Reputation: 16962
Don't forget the greenback having reserve currency status giving you more than just a slight advantage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2017, 05:25 PM
 
Location: Japan
15,292 posts, read 7,779,017 times
Reputation: 10007
Quote:
The US is the third populous country on earth yet has the most dynamic economy

Who thinks having a large population is bad for a country's economy?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2017, 05:27 PM
 
6,940 posts, read 9,694,167 times
Reputation: 3153
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dark Enlightenment View Post
Who thinks having a large population is bad for a country's economy?
Anti immigration folks like you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-14-2017, 05:40 PM
 
Location: Japan
15,292 posts, read 7,779,017 times
Reputation: 10007
Quote:
Originally Posted by knowledgeiskey View Post
Anti immigration folks like you.
No. Obviously, more population will almost always lead to economic growth and a larger economy. I have never argued otherwise. The case against continued mass immigration to America and other developed countries is about maintaining cultural cohesion and overall quality of life. Rapid economic growth is not necessary for that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:57 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top