Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-01-2017, 08:32 AM
 
1,967 posts, read 1,308,970 times
Reputation: 586

Advertisements

Filibuster the Republican Supreme Court Nominee:

The Republican Party’s Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell and their judiciary committee members deliberately prevented the U.S. Senate from discussing and voting upon the Democratic president’s nominee for a seat on the U.S. Supreme Court while a Democratic president was in office. If this was in the best interests of our nation, then surely Democratic Senators should behave no less patriotically. Until at least the year 2021, Democrats should filibuster any discussion or vote for a seat upon the U.S. Supreme Court.

If Republicans behaved contrary to our nation’s best interests, their behavior should not be rewarded to encourage similar or worse occurrences in future senate sessions.

At very least the Democrats should insist that Senator McConnell on behalf of the Republican Party lead the passage of a vote for his own censure and publicly apologize for their undermining the reputation of the U.S. Senate; I do not believe the Democrats should insist upon McConnell’s resignation (if he wishes to remain in the U.S. Senate).

Until such a public Republican apology, it’s Democrats patriotic duty to filibuster any discussion or vote for a seat upon the U.S. Supreme Court while a Republican President is in office.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-01-2017, 08:34 AM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,827,388 times
Reputation: 6509
Lol, Reid made it acceptable for only 50 votes needed.

Gursuch will be seated with or without democrats.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2017, 08:37 AM
 
20,728 posts, read 19,374,196 times
Reputation: 8288
The low information left does not even know its own actions.

Can't. Lefties never learn. You lefties removed the filibuster. You wanted more dictatorial power. How you like da guberment hegemony now?

Edit: In this case though it looks like they can:



U.S. Senate goes 'nuclear,' changes filibuster rules
The rule change does not apply to Supreme Court nominees, who are still subject to a 60-vote filibuster threshold, or to legislation.

However all it takes is weakening it even more with legislation , that can't be filibustered.

Last edited by gwynedd1; 02-01-2017 at 08:51 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2017, 08:37 AM
 
7,272 posts, read 4,216,976 times
Reputation: 5466
You want to filibuster a nominee that will not legislate from the bench and will uphold the constitution? Are you against the USA?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2017, 08:39 AM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,233,828 times
Reputation: 12102
Cruz hinted the nuclear option is available.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2017, 08:41 AM
 
Location: Iowa
865 posts, read 623,609 times
Reputation: 588
Good luck with that
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2017, 08:41 AM
 
34,619 posts, read 21,631,426 times
Reputation: 22232
Quote:
Originally Posted by Supposn View Post
Filibuster the Republican Supreme Court Nominee:

The Republican Party’s Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell and their judiciary committee members deliberately prevented the U.S. Senate from discussing and voting upon the Democratic president’s nominee for a seat on the U.S. Supreme Court while a Democratic president was in office. If this was in the best interests of our nation, then surely Democratic Senators should behave no less patriotically. Until at least the year 2021, Democrats should filibuster any discussion or vote for a seat upon the U.S. Supreme Court.

If Republicans behaved contrary to our nation’s best interests, their behavior should not be rewarded to encourage similar or worse occurrences in future senate sessions.

At very least the Democrats should insist that Senator McConnell on behalf of the Republican Party lead the passage of a vote for his own censure and publicly apologize for their undermining the reputation of the U.S. Senate; I do not believe the Democrats should insist upon McConnell’s resignation (if he wishes to remain in the U.S. Senate).

Until such a public Republican apology, it’s Democrats patriotic duty to filibuster any discussion or vote for a seat upon the U.S. Supreme Court while a Republican President is in office.
Obama, "Elections have consequences."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2017, 08:43 AM
 
20,187 posts, read 23,864,594 times
Reputation: 9283
I would hope the Democrats obstruct... we need to use the nuclear option... the democrats are idiots, every time they tried to break the rules, the blowback has been universally been bad for them... they don't realize the rules was actually to their benefit... forcing the rules to be broken, means, in the future it will be used against them time and time again... The smart person would of told them to trade the vote for the Supreme Court for approval of a policy that they wanted... now they are on the hook for losing every policy and the Supreme Court vote... its a lose-lose situation for the democrats... as I said, before they are going extinct... they are just making it easier for their party to die out...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2017, 08:46 AM
 
Location: Pennsylvania
31,340 posts, read 14,281,167 times
Reputation: 27863
Quote:
Originally Posted by Supposn View Post
Filibuster the Republican Supreme Court Nominee:

The Republican Party’s Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell and their judiciary committee members deliberately prevented the U.S. Senate from discussing and voting upon the Democratic president’s nominee for a seat on the U.S. Supreme Court while a Democratic president was in office. If this was in the best interests of our nation, then surely Democratic Senators should behave no less patriotically. Until at least the year 2021, Democrats should filibuster any discussion or vote for a seat upon the U.S. Supreme Court.

If Republicans behaved contrary to our nation’s best interests, their behavior should not be rewarded to encourage similar or worse occurrences in future senate sessions.

At very least the Democrats should insist that Senator McConnell on behalf of the Republican Party lead the passage of a vote for his own censure and publicly apologize for their undermining the reputation of the U.S. Senate; I do not believe the Democrats should insist upon McConnell’s resignation (if he wishes to remain in the U.S. Senate).

Until such a public Republican apology, it’s Democrats patriotic duty to filibuster any discussion or vote for a seat upon the U.S. Supreme Court while a Republican President is in office.
Can't.
Rules are going to be changed -- majority vote this time around. No filibuster.


SORRY!!!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2017, 08:48 AM
 
4,279 posts, read 1,905,917 times
Reputation: 1266
Fine, then we can use the nuclear option where we don't need the democrats.

What is that? That is unfair?

you can thank Reid For that, you people seemed to think it was fair when you implemented it.

Sit down, your services are no longer required.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top