Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-03-2017, 02:12 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,315 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15647

Advertisements

Well here we go, eliminating environmental rules and loosening gun regulations, I guess our streams were too clean and gun laws were overly restrictive.

Quote:
Published February 02, 2017



WASHINGTON – The Republican-controlled Congress on Thursday scrapped Obama-era rules on the environment and guns, counting on a new ally in the White House to help reverse years of what the GOP calls excessive regulation.

The Senate gave final approval to a measure eliminating a rule to prevent coal mining debris from being dumped into nearby streams, while the House backed a separate resolution doing away with extended background checks for gun purchases by some Social Security recipients with mental disabilities.

The Senate's 54-45 vote sends the repeal of the stream protection rule to President Donald Trump, who is expected to sign it. The gun measure awaits Senate action.

Congress scraps Obama-era rules on coal mining, background checks | Fox News
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-03-2017, 02:14 PM
 
Location: Central Mexico and Central Florida
7,150 posts, read 4,906,179 times
Reputation: 10444
Trump-holes don't need clean water. They survive on Mountain Dew.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2017, 02:17 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,634,918 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Well here we go, eliminating environmental rules and loosening gun regulations, I guess our streams were too clean and gun laws were overly restrictive.




Congress scraps Obama-era rules on coal mining, background checks | Fox News
Mining is a States resources and usually goes with the mineral rights of the person that owns the property. So, he gave them back their liberty.... Big deal. Nothing keeps the State from regulating it.
Only individual persons themselves have the liberty to regulate their own firearms. The federal government cannot infringe, or have an opinion about it that matters one way or the other.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2017, 02:20 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,059,937 times
Reputation: 17865
This law just went into effect, it's one of those last minute Obama regulations.

There are already numerous Federal and state regulations over this. It's best handled by the states instead of an over reaching one size fits all regulation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2017, 02:21 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,634,918 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
This law just went into effect, it's one of those last minute Obama regulations.

There are already numerous Federal and state regulations over this. It's best handled by the states instead of an over reaching one size fits all regulation.
2nd & 10th Amendment restoration.
Are you friggin kidding me! I thought I'd never live long enough to see this day. I'm tearing up...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2017, 02:25 PM
 
9,837 posts, read 4,638,052 times
Reputation: 7292
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Well here we go, eliminating environmental rules and loosening gun regulations, I guess our streams were too clean and gun laws were overly restrictive.




Congress scraps Obama-era rules on coal mining, background checks | Fox News
one concern is the removal of the requirement to inform the federal government when a corporation in the mining or drilling industry pays a foreign government. This was brought it to ensure no payoffs to corrupt governments and more importantly to ensure no funny business with swaps and under the counter purchases ... with sanctioned nations etc.... hell if they don't have to report it , the gov has to find it....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2017, 02:26 PM
 
6,205 posts, read 7,461,717 times
Reputation: 3563
Wouldn't it be better for Trump if he let congress do the work instead of his much publicized (and stupid) exec orders?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2017, 02:34 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,315 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15647
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
This law just went into effect, it's one of those last minute Obama regulations.

There are already numerous Federal and state regulations over this. It's best handled by the states instead of an over reaching one size fits all regulation.
Well if dumping into streams is already addressed that's fine, just seems like it should be a national policy. Streams do cross over state borders as we have seen in the case in Oklahoma Arkansas relative to poultry pollution,


Does WV adhere to this?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2017, 02:46 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,059,937 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by oberon_1 View Post
Wouldn't it be better for Trump if he let congress do the work instead of his much publicized (and stupid) exec orders?
Logically it was stupid when the Obama administration implemented it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-03-2017, 03:54 PM
 
6,205 posts, read 7,461,717 times
Reputation: 3563
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
Logically it was stupid when the Obama administration implemented it?
Obama had no choice. Republicans in congress blocked him like a wall (pun intended).
Trump is the first president in decades to benefit from majority in both congress and senate. Neither George W, nor Clinton or Reagan had this luxury. It probably won't be there for Donald as well in 2 years.

However, only after I wrote the post I got how wrong it is: if congress does it, they get all the glory! What will be left for Donald?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:41 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top