Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-09-2017, 09:01 AM
 
18,984 posts, read 9,067,948 times
Reputation: 14688

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Have you not been reading my posts? I keep saying either parent can opt out.

Choice cuts both ways.
But the child doesn't get a chance to "opt out." They have to be housed and supported and fed and educated and clothed. So no, neither side gets out of that if the child is ultimately born. Doesn't matter whether the man wanted it or not, once it's here it has to be supported. He can chalk it up to the consequence of having unprotected sex and a woman who didn't want to abort the child. That's the bottom line. You create a child, you pay for it.

That is an entirely different subject than forcing a woman who doesn't want a child to have it against her will. That is a choice of what a woman wants to do with her own body. And a man should never have the final say in that decision, even if it means he is going to be on the hook for child support for 18 years. Tough luck.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-09-2017, 09:02 AM
 
Location: Boston, MA
14,480 posts, read 11,273,359 times
Reputation: 8996
Dismembering a fetus in the second trimester is barbaric and a woman who claims to have been raped by her husband but waits for more than three months to pass before aborting is stupid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2017, 09:02 AM
 
7,235 posts, read 7,034,747 times
Reputation: 12265
InformedConsent, are you drafting a bill to allow men to not financially support their children?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2017, 09:04 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,971 posts, read 44,780,079 times
Reputation: 13681
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cantabridgienne View Post
Is that what the law says?
No, because it discriminates against men. They don't have the right to choose to opt out of parenthood like women do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2017, 09:05 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,971 posts, read 44,780,079 times
Reputation: 13681
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cantabridgienne View Post
InformedConsent, are you drafting a bill to allow men to not financially support their children?
Perhaps. How would that be any different than a woman's choice to abort?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2017, 09:07 AM
 
14,294 posts, read 13,181,676 times
Reputation: 17797
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Perhaps. How would that be any different than a woman's choice to abort?
In one case there is an unsupported live child? In the other, there isn't. This is not hard.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2017, 09:08 AM
 
Location: Finland
6,418 posts, read 7,244,561 times
Reputation: 10440
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
In fact, it most definitely is.

1) The woman doesn't want the child, and chooses to abort.

2) The father doesn't want the child, but is forced against his will to support a child he didn't want to begin with for 18+ years.
Nope. Abortion is about a medical decision concerning one person's body. Child support is a financial matter concerning a human being that is unable to provide for themselves and two people are responsible for that child. Two very different matters.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2017, 09:09 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,971 posts, read 44,780,079 times
Reputation: 13681
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post
But the child doesn't get a chance to "opt out." They have to be housed and supported and fed and educated and clothed.
That's the woman's choice and financial responsibility if she continues the pregnancy to term but the man opts out.

If she can choose to abort at will, he can choose to abort financial responsibility at will. How is that not fair?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2017, 09:12 AM
 
1,915 posts, read 1,479,957 times
Reputation: 3238
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
No, because it discriminates against men. They don't have the right to choose to opt out of parenthood like women do.
Neither side gets to opt out once the child is born. After the child is born both parents are expected to support the child. Where the choice is is before the child is born. A man not wanting kids should use birth control of his own and make sure his partner is also using it as backup. Same goes for a woman, use birth control of her own and make sure her partner uses backup.

But that's a totally different topic and you should make a thread about that. This topic is about women who were raped, probably didn't have time to prepare with birth control, certainly had no power to make sure the man was using it and got pregnant because this was forced on her. And then, on top of, her rapist gets to make her medical decisions.

This topic has nothing to do with consensual sex and choices.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2017, 09:15 AM
 
36,499 posts, read 30,827,524 times
Reputation: 32753
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
It doesnt fall 100% on the woman, though. No baby is created without sperm.

Both parents get the choice to opt out. Choice cuts both ways.

How is that not fair?
What DC said.
You have no argument and you know it.
Once the egg is fertilized it falls 100% on the female.
You refuse to acknowledge the difference in being a parent of a child and incubating a fetus or the difference in interfering with an individuals medical decisions and financial responsibility for your born child.
A fetus is not a child. An abortion is a medical procedure that has 0% liability for the man. Once birth takes place the only way a woman can opt out is to put the child up for adoption which has 0% liability for the man. If she keeps the child she is on the hook for being a parent. More so for her because she not only has to provide financially but also actually be a parent.

Your choice cuts both ways is just an example of the mentality of those who want to use forced pregnancy and birth as a means of control and punishment, "if she can do this, then I get to do that. If I cant do that, then she cant do that".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top