Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Looks like as in the Oregon case, Federal Attorneys seek to suppress evidence, attempting to whitewash this illegal operation of the BLM, regardless of whether they had a court order or not, by silencing any testimony that would expose their evil and corrupt organization and deeds.
Now, defendants in the case of US v. Cliven Bundy are concerned that the prosecution withheld this report, because Love is the government's star witness in the case.
Among the things they sought to suppress in testimony were:
References to the occupation of the Malheur national Wildlife Refuge, the subsequent trial, United States v. Ammon Bundy et al., or the result of the trial.
References to supposed mistreatment of cattle during the impoundment operation or agency, or officer, misconduct in this or other impoundment operations or investigations.
Arguments or opinions that the federal government, its officers and agents or its agencies are improperly and excessively armed, use military tactics, act outside their authority or have engaged in the use of excessive force in other venues or at other times.
Hearsay statements or opinions regarding the BLM, the impoundment operation, or the events of April 12, including opinions and statements of elected or appointed government officials (such as Nevada Governor Sandoval, U.S. Senators Orrin Hatch, Harry Reid, U.S. Congressman-Elect Ruben Kikuen, Nevada Assemblywoman Michelle Fiore.).
Legal arguments or opinions that the federal government does not, or should not, own public lands, that the federal government does not, or should now own the Gold Butte range, or that the Gold Butte Range has now been designated a National Monument by the President of the United States.
Legal arguments or opinions that law enforcement officers within the Department of Interior are not constitutional, that "natural law" or other authority permits the use of force against law enforcement officers in defense of property or individual rights, or that the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada is illegitimate.
I'm curious how this armed militia group's take over of federal land compares and contrasts with all the "republicans never protest - only dirty liberals do that!" threads we've been having lately.
Thanks for reminding folks that, yes, republicans also protest.
I'm curious how this armed militia group's take over of federal land compares and contrasts with all the "republicans never protest - only dirty liberals do that!" threads we've been having lately.
Thanks for reminding folks that, yes, republicans also protest.
Yeah, I thought all right-wingers loved America so so so so much. And never caused caused chaos and destruction like whiny snowflake lefties...? Because, you know, nobody loves America like right-wing patriots...
I'm curious how this armed militia group's take over of federal land compares and contrasts with all the "republicans never protest - only dirty liberals do that!" threads we've been having lately.
Thanks for reminding folks that, yes, republicans also protest.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AfternoonCoffee
Yeah, I thought all right-wingers loved America so so so so much. And never caused caused chaos and destruction like whiny snowflake lefties...? Because, you know, nobody loves America like right-wing patriots...
Because Constitutionalist, know their rights and how to exercise them without hurting anyone.
Cannot say that for the limp wristed liberal snowflakes or BLM under Obamas directive.
Because Constitutionalist, know their rights and how to exercise them without hurting anyone.
Cannot say that for the limp wristed liberal snowflakes or BLM under Obamas directive.
Because Constitutionalist, know their rights and how to exercise them without hurting anyone.
Cannot say that for the limp wristed liberal snowflakes or BLM under Obamas directive.
Someone needs to tell the Bundy-boys that it is now legal to run over protesters.
I'll have to remember that.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
