Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So Carbon on the earth's surface is an anomaly? Fun Fact: Only 12 elements exist in quantities greater than 0.1% of the Earth's crust.
How would the human body work without potassium? It comprises less than 0.4% of our body. I wonder how we'd fare without iron.
Fun Fact: In science, something existing at 0.4% is not an anomaly.
The functionality of those entire systems NEED a small amount of carbon, potassium, etc. Human behavior can't be compared to inanimate, complex systems. Society would be perfectly fine with zero gay population, or less than 0.4%, whereas the human body or earth's atmosphere would not properly function.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gallowsCalibrator
The live action production of Beauty and the Beast is rated PG meaning that parents should be advised that it has content that not all parents will approve of for their special snowflakes. This is different from the G-rated animation from 1991.
So the left/makers of the film even admit that it is not normal and the fact they had to change the rating because of the inclusion of gay behavior proves that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gallowsCalibrator
Adding in a homosexual supporting character is propaganda to normalize homosexuality... but yet you have no problem with a 17-year old getting into a relationship with a 21-year old and no problem with that 21-year old being an animal.
You don't need to explain to your child that humans do not fall in love with animals.
What is the point of including a gay character unless some political agenda is behind it?
The functionality of those entire systems NEED a small amount of carbon, potassium, etc. Human behavior can't be compared to inanimate, complex systems. Society would be perfectly fine with zero gay population, or less than 0.4%, whereas the human body or earth's atmosphere would not properly function.
So the left/makers of the film even admit that it is not normal and the fact they had to change the rating because of the inclusion of gay behavior proves that.
You don't need to explain to your child that humans do not fall in love with animals.
What is the point of including a gay character unless some political agenda is behind it?
So...your kid is never going to find out about gay people?
The functionality of those entire systems NEED a small amount of carbon, potassium, etc. Human behavior can't be compared to inanimate, complex systems. Society would be perfectly fine with zero gay population, or less than 0.4%, whereas the human body or earth's atmosphere would not properly function.
I'm pretty sure the earth would function without Osmium. Petition to get rid of Osmium.
But funny thing is, human behavior is a complex system. That's why concepts like "love" and "attraction" are neither immutable nor perfectly measurable. Same thing regarding homosexuality. Could we theoretically exist without any homosexuals? Sure. But since they're here, it's not unnatural by any means, nor an anomaly. There are complex biological and genetic factors at play.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lordwillin02
So the left/makers of the film even admit that it is not normal and the fact they had to change the rating because of the inclusion of gay behavior proves that.
Nobody said homosexuality was not normal.
Nobody said the rating change was purely as a result of the inclusion of gay behaviour.
The only thing that was stated is that the belief that this was a movie created purely for extremely young children is factually incorrect. It could be the fact that live-action violence is typically rated higher than animated violence. It could be a full on heterosexual make-out session between a child and a 21-year old animal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lordwillin02
You don't need to explain to your child that humans do not fall in love with animals.
Really? Then why is sex with animals legal in 8 states?
If having a homosexual supporting character promotes normalization of homosexuality, why doesn't an interspecies relationship between a legal child and a 21-year old animal promote ephebophilia and beastiality?
Quote:
Originally Posted by lordwillin02
What is the point of including a gay character unless some political agenda is behind it?
What's the point in a child falling in love with an adult who just happens to be an animal?
Pushing homosexuality on impressionable young children,and I know when it comes out my Theater releases what its going to play week ahead of time.
snipped
So let me understand what you are thinking (I get the theater listings part).
You believe that the scriptwriters wrote a gay character into a movie with the primary purpose of trying to promote homosexuality in the minds of children?
So let me understand what you are thinking (I get the theater listings part).
You believe that the scriptwriters wrote a gay character into a movie with the primary purpose of trying to promote homosexuality in the minds of children?
In public? What are you even on about. I never said anything about sex in public. What is on the tv in the privacy of your own home is up to the individual, yes?
/faacepalm
That TV broadcasts publicly as well and sexual content is a problem even on the public air ways. Besides, if we take your argument, then everything is private because people watch it on a TV in their home! Your argument is being devious here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Town FFX
What are you holy rollers watching where you are exposed to porn on a daily basis? It's certainly not on any of the shows I view.
Many shows depict full on sex scenes on TV, strong sexual content in the middle of the day. Seeing two people grind on each other in the middle of the day or content that is strongly sexual in nature. As I said previously, we have come a long way from the tasteful days of "cut to black" or adult content hidden behind clever metaphors. Now days they are blatant, graphic and deliberate. What is funny is that you make the same argument made years ago when people objected to the increasing sex on TV. You push it further, the further we go, the more graphic it becomes....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Town FFX
Again, no one is advocating children watching porn, stop trying to make something out of nothing.
It is the natural progression and course TV has taken from its beginning. If I told people 60+ years ago what would be on today, they would have scoffed at how that would NEVER be allowed on the public air waves, yet... here we are.
This however does not excuse your initial argument that you are running from. Your claim in defense of increasing sexual content displayed on TV was that it was "Healthy and Natural", as if to excuse its graphic content because of such, to imply that there is nothing wrong with children seeing such when I made the argument that it was inappropriate.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
