Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-14-2017, 09:55 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,740,361 times
Reputation: 13868

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by OrganicSmallHome View Post
Bootlick, bootlick, bootlick. "Oh, Mr. OrangeHead, you are my HERO!! *swoon, swoon* You paid only 4% in federal income tax, which proves how SMART you are!! You WIN AGAIN! PLEASE, PLEASE, may I lick your boots just one more time??"

4% in federal income tax. 4%.
^^^ MELT DOWN.. MELT DOWN.. you are disappointed once again. MELT DOWN ^^^

Hurry, hurry, see the liberal side show begin lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-14-2017, 09:57 PM
 
Location: North of Canada, but not the Arctic
21,142 posts, read 19,722,567 times
Reputation: 25674
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
the release of an individual's unauthorized tax returns is a felony.

On this issue, the U.S. code on unauthorized disclosure of information states quite clearly that "It shall be unlawful for any person to whom any return or return information (as defined in section 6103(b)) is disclosed in a manner unauthorized by this title thereafter willfully to print or publish in any manner not provided by law any such return or return information... Any violation of this paragraph shall be a felony punishable by a fine in any amount not exceeding $5,000, or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution."
Good find. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/7213
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2017, 09:57 PM
 
25,021 posts, read 27,938,262 times
Reputation: 11790
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
the release of an individual's unauthorized tax returns is a felony.

On this issue, the U.S. code on unauthorized disclosure of information states quite clearly that "It shall be unlawful for any person to whom any return or return information (as defined in section 6103(b)) is disclosed in a manner unauthorized by this title thereafter willfully to print or publish in any manner not provided by law any such return or return information... Any violation of this paragraph shall be a felony punishable by a fine in any amount not exceeding $5,000, or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution."
Except Maddow didn't release it. It's not illegal for her to do so, because she received the tax return without solicitation from David Cay Johnston, who got it from an unknown mail at his house. The person who leaked it would be prosecutable, but not Johnston or Maddow. Besides, why do you care? Do you have a vested interest in Trump?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2017, 10:01 PM
 
Location: Land of Thought and Flow
8,323 posts, read 15,171,483 times
Reputation: 4957
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
^^^ MELT DOWN.. MELT DOWN.. you are disappointed once again. MELT DOWN ^^^

Hurry, hurry, see the liberal side show begin lol
Hey, hey. #NotAllLiberals
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2017, 10:01 PM
 
41,110 posts, read 25,740,361 times
Reputation: 13868
Quote:
Originally Posted by retiredcop111 View Post
Maddow made this into a major story. Now she looks to be the fool!! Trump is laughing his rear end off now lol!!!! Trump wins again. The corrupt media once again is shown to be the shills that they are. Lets move on to a Russian non story again!!!
You know you are desperate for ratings when you are willing to violate the law to push a story.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2017, 10:03 PM
 
Location: ATX/Houston
1,896 posts, read 811,827 times
Reputation: 515
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
She claims to have them and will reveal them tonight


https://mobile.twitter.com/maddow/st...rc=twsrc%5Etfw
This was a shrewd Trump admin move. Release the taxes for a year that looks good and then claim they were illegally taken.

He swings wildly between incompetence and shrewdness.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2017, 10:05 PM
 
Location: on the edge of Sanity
14,268 posts, read 18,938,206 times
Reputation: 7982
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
So now it appears that in addition to the CIA and FBI, there an anti-Trump mole at the IRS as well.
No, not really. Sometimes you need to produce your tax returns for other reasons.

I think it's interesting that his supporters don't care that he now wants to eliminate the alternative minimum tax after this proves he would have only paid about 4% without it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2017, 10:07 PM
 
Location: ATX/Houston
1,896 posts, read 811,827 times
Reputation: 515
Quote:
Originally Posted by petch751 View Post
You know you are desperate for ratings when you are willing to violate the law to push a story.
Trump and his folks released the information..... I will tip my hat at this shrewd move as this particular year of Trump's taxes has him paying quite a bit compared to essentially the decade where he wrote hundreds of millions in loses. Smart political move.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2017, 10:09 PM
 
1,666 posts, read 1,018,303 times
Reputation: 846
Quote:
Originally Posted by okcthunder1945 View Post
Because the the tax system is intentionally complex in order for the wealthy to hide their money.
I don't really agree here. I'd say the tax code is complex because it's constantly being adjusted for various social, economic and even health reasons on an ad-hoc basis. Therefore after some time the code becomes a hodgepodge of random rules and regulations.

Reagan sought to adjust this is in 1986 by re-establishing the entire code. However after 30+ years it's become a mess again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2017, 10:11 PM
 
Location: North of Canada, but not the Arctic
21,142 posts, read 19,722,567 times
Reputation: 25674
Quote:
Originally Posted by theunbrainwashed View Post
Except Maddow didn't release it. It's not illegal for her to do so, because she received the tax return without solicitation from David Cay Johnston, who got it from an unknown mail at his house. The person who leaked it would be prosecutable, but not Johnston or Maddow. Besides, why do you care? Do you have a vested interest in Trump?
She "printed or published" it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:17 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top