Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-03-2017, 05:13 AM
 
27,214 posts, read 46,767,070 times
Reputation: 15667

Advertisements

The over the top biases of the channels has caused these channels to not being seen as journalism and just a bunch of dumb hosts who are the extended arm of Obama and Clinton.

Even with being part of the Obama/ Clinton clan and having so much power, they couldn't win the election.

Now we have Obamagate and unmasking which is a crime th way it seems to have been done.

This goes back to when Trump not even had announced to run for the presidency and no Russian relations were part of the unmasking

Susan Rice seems to be behind it which means Obama was part of it.

Meanwhile the mainstream garbage media is quiet.
Just wait until they can't be quiet any longer.

Does anyone still hear "tax returns"? That was a boomerang in the mainstream media's face so the mainstream media go MIA on that one!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-03-2017, 05:18 AM
 
Location: OH->FL->NJ
17,005 posts, read 12,600,110 times
Reputation: 8925
Welcome to the age of misinformation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2017, 05:27 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,314 posts, read 26,236,916 times
Reputation: 15652
Quote:
Originally Posted by bentlebee View Post
The over the top biases of the channels has caused these channels to not being seen as journalism and just a bunch of dumb hosts who are the extended arm of Obama and Clinton.

Even with being part of the Obama/ Clinton clan and having so much power, they couldn't win the election.

Now we have Obamagate and unmasking which is a crime th way it seems to have been done.

This goes back to when Trump not even had announced to run for the presidency and no Russian relations were part of the unmasking

Susan Rice seems to be behind it which means Obama was part of it.

Meanwhile the mainstream garbage media is quiet.
Just wait until they can't be quiet any longer.

Does anyone still hear "tax returns"? That was a boomerang in the mainstream media's face so the mainstream media go MIA on that one!
Well there is always Fox News with the stories that no one else has!


I haven't heard the Susan Rice conspiracy, it would be helpful if you provided some facts. The only person I have heard that indicated unmasking was Nunes, if that's your only source then you are guilty of National Enquirer Journalism.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2017, 05:28 AM
 
Location: Ft. Myers
19,719 posts, read 16,854,718 times
Reputation: 41863
They have invented this great little thing called a TV remote control. Here is how it works: If you don't like something on TV, you press a button and it changes channels, so you do not have to watch the offending program !

Get yourself one, it will change your life. However, for those of us who like those channels, we can simply leave the TV on that program. Whodathunk !
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2017, 06:24 AM
 
9,617 posts, read 6,067,889 times
Reputation: 3884
Isn't it an amazing deflection, failure to address the subject that we get a lecture on TV remote controls? Undeniable there was revealing of Trump transition and administration officials identities by the Obama administration, as a result of surveillance of foreign officials. Much worse then the third rate Watergate burglary. Cover up dwarfs the Watergate cover up.

Yet, we get the shallowness of remote control TV etiquette. Wouldn't expect less from the loyal opposition would we?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2017, 06:28 AM
 
6,822 posts, read 6,638,670 times
Reputation: 3771
Quote:
Originally Posted by don1945 View Post
They have invented this great little thing called a TV remote control. Here is how it works: If you don't like something on TV, you press a button and it changes channels, so you do not have to watch the offending program !

Get yourself one, it will change your life. However, for those of us who like those channels, we can simply leave the TV on that program. Whodathunk !
Yes that works for entertainment. The adults here are talking about the NEWS.


Only a fool can't see the concern of a corrupt media projecting to the masses.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vL8dHf16CEs
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2017, 06:38 AM
 
45,585 posts, read 27,209,359 times
Reputation: 23898
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Well there is always Fox News with the stories that no one else has!


I haven't heard the Susan Rice conspiracy, it would be helpful if you provided some facts. The only person I have heard that indicated unmasking was Nunes, if that's your only source then you are guilty of National Enquirer Journalism.
Susan Rice Requested Unmasking of Incoming Trump Administration Officials

The White House Counsel’s office identified Rice as the person responsible for the unmasking after examining Rice’s document log requests. The reports Rice requested to see are kept under tightly-controlled conditions. Each person must log her name before being granted access to them.

....
“Unmasking” is the process of identifying individuals whose communications were caught in the dragnet of intelligence gathering. While conducting investigations into terrorism and other related crimes, intelligence analysts incidentally capture conversations about parties not subject to the search warrant. The identities of individuals who are not under investigation are kept confidential, for legal and moral reasons.


--------------
Obama's rule changes opened door for NSA intercepts of Americans to reach political hands

As his presidency drew to a close, Barack Obama’s top aides routinely reviewed intelligence reports gleaned from the National Security Agency’s incidental intercepts of Americans abroad, taking advantage of rules their boss relaxed starting in 2011 to help the government better fight terrorism, espionage by foreign enemies and hacking threats, Circa has learned.

...
Sometimes the Americans’ names were officially unmasked; other times they were so specifically described in the reports that their identities were readily discernible. Among those cleared to request and consume unmasked NSA-based intelligence reports about U.S. citizens were Obama’s national security adviser Susan Rice, his CIA Director John Brennan and then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2017, 06:45 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,314 posts, read 26,236,916 times
Reputation: 15652
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
Susan Rice Requested Unmasking of Incoming Trump Administration Officials
The White House Counsel’s office identified Rice as the person responsible for the unmasking after examining Rice’s document log requests. The reports Rice requested to see are kept under tightly-controlled conditions. Each person must log her name before being granted access to them.

....
“Unmasking” is the process of identifying individuals whose communications were caught in the dragnet of intelligence gathering. While conducting investigations into terrorism and other related crimes, intelligence analysts incidentally capture conversations about parties not subject to the search warrant. The identities of individuals who are not under investigation are kept confidential, for legal and moral reasons.
--------------
Obama's rule changes opened door for NSA intercepts of Americans to reach political hands

As his presidency drew to a close, Barack Obama’s top aides routinely reviewed intelligence reports gleaned from the National Security Agency’s incidental intercepts of Americans abroad, taking advantage of rules their boss relaxed starting in 2011 to help the government better fight terrorism, espionage by foreign enemies and hacking threats, Circa has learned.

...
Sometimes the Americans’ names were officially unmasked; other times they were so specifically described in the reports that their identities were readily discernible. Among those cleared to request and consume unmasked NSA-based intelligence reports about U.S. citizens were Obama’s national security adviser Susan Rice, his CIA Director John Brennan and then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch.
I was hoping for something major source other than Zero Hedge but thank you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2017, 06:48 AM
 
45,585 posts, read 27,209,359 times
Reputation: 23898
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
I was hoping for something major source other than Zero Hedge but thank you.
Zero Hedge was not mentioned in anything I posted. What is this you are doing?

Just because certain media outlets neglect to report an account does not mean it does not exist.

2 White House Officials Helped Give Nunes Intelligence Reports

Mr. Nunes has acknowledged that the incidental intelligence gathering on Trump associates last year was not necessarily unlawful, and that it was not specifically directed at Mr. Trump or people close to him. American intelligence agencies typically monitor foreign officials of allied and hostile countries, and they routinely sweep up communications linked to Americans who may be taking part in the conversation or are being spoken about.

The real issue, Mr. Nunes has said, was that he could figure out the identities of Trump associates from reading reports about intercepted communications that were shared among Obama administration officials with top security clearances.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2017, 06:49 AM
 
26,511 posts, read 15,088,692 times
Reputation: 14670
Quote:
Originally Posted by don1945 View Post
They have invented this great little thing called a TV remote control. Here is how it works: If you don't like something on TV, you press a button and it changes channels, so you do not have to watch the offending program !

Get yourself one, it will change your life. However, for those of us who like those channels, we can simply leave the TV on that program. Whodathunk !
Wait, your response to misinformation is that you like it...not that it isn't?!?!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:34 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top