Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It is illegal, Why T, crying Obama wire tapped him is such a big deal. It is an illegal act he is randomly accusing presidents of.
Incidental means 3 party. Say you and I now talking about stupid Nunes. The mod, being the Intel people, has heard us chatting about Nunes. Our chat is noted and Nunes names must be blackened for the mods boss to see the whole post. That is incidental info . The person we talking about. Not any targets.
Nunes being part of the investigating side, running to the WH with the info -is out of protocol and raises questions :
Who is Nunes loyal to- T or the investigation?
Why run to the WH first ? His Job be to call the committee when found new evidence.
Why not sharing the docs with the committee?
Why so upset of what you did see or think you saw ?
All very slimey
Obama wanted Putin's support when whispering ,if I get elected I will have more flexibility. Obama the snake.
It's time to snake the toilet and drain the cesspool in the FBI. Starting with Gestapo Komandante Comey.
Bannon was right. This election and subsequent new illegal surveillance will set the democrats for 50 or 60 yrs. The real question....are the Republicans willing to set this all in motion...
This new revelations about surveillance on private American citizens is a great excuse for Paul Ry'no to shelve Obamakare 2.0, and give it time for the proper "repeal"
There would have been no incidental surveillance if many of Trumps' associates hadn't frequently communicated with the Russians. This so called revelation just further confirms the curious connection of the Trump people with Russia.
At this point of the time, we do not know weather Trump colluded with Russian or He is just a fortunate beneficiary of Russian propaganda against Clinton.
Adam Schiff, Ranking Member of the House Intel Committee confirmed today he has now seen direct evidence of Trump and his team working with Russia to swing the election.
Quote:
If it is true, how come all the polls showed Clinton victory?
State polls were flawed, and Russians hacked voter registration rolls which may have had an impact. National polls said Clinton would win the popular vote, and she did.
Quote:
All of us were sure about Clinton victory. How come elections polls and all the media missed Russian propaganda before the elections.
People not willing to admit they were going to vote for Trump? The polls really have nothing to do with what Russia did. As Comey said, even Putin figured Trump was going to lose, so he just spent time undermining Clinton to weaken her likely Presidency.
Plus the Democratic party in collusion with the liberal media feeding them illegal info on Trump. We see it every day.
Trump is vindicated once again.. again & again, and the lies of the criminally dishonest mainstream media & their partners the democrats are ignored because, by now, they are already moving on to another manufactured distraction to drum up more fake outrage over.
Who honestly wasn't expecting this? This winning has become so routine and predictable is just getting tedious now.
What I really want to know is are any heads in the intelligence community going to roll over this and was Comey actually lying his a s s off when he definitively said there was no surveillance of Trump that he knew about? If so, I dont see how gets out of being fired and criminally prosecuted.
Also, will the Fox News bosses held accountable for firing Judge Napolitano? I hope he takes them to court and sues, thereby exposing the fact that all of them have firmly planted themselves well up into paul ryan's a s s hole.
No, he did not say who he got it from; it was anonymous (ironic since he was complaining about anon sources during the Comey hearing). The only people who have seen the report are Nunes, and presumably Trump.
He has to share with the House Committee, because it involves information related to the investigation of Trump and the Intel Committee are the first to see that info. Nunes owes nothing to Trump. Trump isn't his boss, and it's extremely serious for him to reveal classified info of an investigation to the subject of that investigation.
He doesn't own anything to committee either. It is something he gathered from outside source. We are again going after the messenger when all along we are waiting for information. He shared this with CIA, NSA and house speaker. He should share with FBI and DOJ who are investigating and share his committee. It is alarming that, he doesn't seem to trust FBI. Do you think if Schiff gathers some information, is he going to give it to committee and keep quiet? Nunes is playing for his side and Schiff is playing for his side.
There would have been no incidental surveillance if many of Trumps' associates hadn't frequently communicated with the Russians. This so called revelation just further confirms the curious connection of the Trump people with Russia.
The big problem the spying had nothing to do with finding out about Russian contacts. They spied in areas that had nothing to do with Russia but kept that spying information. It was broader than that.
Yes he does. Committee has right to know what he knows. That's how committees work, and he will likely be forced to resign as Chair over this.
Quote:
It is something he gathered from outside source.
Why would Nunes know about it, but not Schiff? They get the same intel.
Quote:
He shared this with CIA, NSA and house speaker. He should share with FBI and DOJ who are investigating and share his committee. It is alarming that, he doesn't seem to trust FBI. Do you think if Schiff gathers some information, is he going to give it to committee and keep quiet? Nunes is playing for his side and Schiff is playing for his side.
He didn't share it with FBI or CIA, just Paul Ryan and Trump.
Nunes is playing for Trump and Russia. Schiff is playing for America. That's absolutely clear.
Trump is vindicated once again.. again & again, and the lies of the criminally dishonest mainstream media & their partners the democrats are ignored because, by now, they are already moving on to another manufactured distraction to drum up more fake outrage over.
Who honestly wasn't expecting this? This winning has become so routine and predictable is just getting tedious now.
What I really want to know is are any heads in the intelligence community going to roll over this and was Comey actually lying his a s s off when he definitively said there was no surveillance of Trump that he knew about? If so, I dont see how gets out of being fired and criminally prosecuted.
Also, will the Fox News bosses held accountable for firing Judge Napolitano? I hope he takes them to court and sues, thereby exposing the fact that all of them have firmly planted themselves well up into paul ryan's a s s hole.
He is not vindicated.
Trump Tweets:
Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!
Is it legal for a sitting President to be "wire tapping" a race for president prior to an election? Turned down by court earlier. A NEW LOW!
I'd bet a good lawyer could make a great case out of the fact that President Obama was tapping my phones in October, just prior to Election!
How low has President Obama gone to tapp my phones during the very sacred election process. This is Nixon/Watergate. Bad (or sick) guy!
Obama did not tap his wires. Trump made a false accusation with no real evidence. It has been proven wrong.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.