Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-31-2017, 10:43 AM
 
Location: Bel Air, California
23,766 posts, read 29,058,499 times
Reputation: 37337

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
To hit their accomplices in case they behave too much like idiots.

the 3 stooges would always rely on a hammer or one of those crank drills
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-31-2017, 10:46 AM
 
Location: Arizona, The American Southwest
54,498 posts, read 33,869,039 times
Reputation: 91679
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
I kinda take exception to the "home invasion" charge too. Sounds more to me like a simple burglary that went wrong. Home invasion makes it sound much worse, but the kids obviously thought that no one was home.

In what home invasion originally meant, it was the act of busting violently into a home KNOWING that the residents are there.

But the way these states are upcharging these crimes, I guess that's par for the course nowadays.
Whether or not they knew somebody was home, a home invasion is a home invasion, the woman and the 3 dead criminals had no business being there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2017, 11:00 AM
 
Location: A safe distance from San Francisco
12,350 posts, read 9,722,262 times
Reputation: 13892
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1AngryTaxPayer View Post
Pretty sure when you see people carrying a weapon the thought crosses your mind worst case scenario. Unless, of course, you don't believe knives can kill.
And this has absolutely nothing to do with what I said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2017, 12:15 PM
 
Location: San Diego
50,294 posts, read 47,056,299 times
Reputation: 34079
Quote:
Originally Posted by Floorist View Post
True. I have a friend who is retired LAPD. 25 years in gang country. And he has to pass a background check to buy ammunition.
That goes into effect next year. I've been hording reloading supplies for over a year now. What a stupid law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2017, 01:36 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,865,154 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1AngryTaxPayer View Post
What exactly would you need brass knuckles for if you thought no one was home.
So the thought never occurred to you that they didn't think anyone was home but IF someone was, they wanted to be able to take action.

And then the very next post you say this

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1AngryTaxPayer View Post
Pretty sure when you see people carrying a weapon the thought crosses your mind worst case scenario. Unless, of course, you don't believe knives can kill.
So the victim can think worst case but not the perps?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2017, 02:03 PM
 
Location: San Diego
50,294 posts, read 47,056,299 times
Reputation: 34079
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
So the thought never occurred to you that they didn't think anyone was home but IF someone was, they wanted to be able to take action.

And then the very next post you say this

So the victim can think worst case but not the perps?
I think we agree here. They knew it was possible someone could be home and they would take care of them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2017, 02:38 PM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,865,154 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1AngryTaxPayer View Post
I think we agree here. They knew it was possible someone could be home and they would take care of them.
I actually didn't focus correctly on this.

this question isn't pertinent
Q:Why would they take those items the first time? (this is how I was incorrectly talking about the issue)
A: In case some one was there.


this question is pertinent
Q:Why would they take those items the second time? (this is what I assume you are talking about)
A: They "almost had to know", at a minimum, that the chances increased that some one was there.

A "professional criminal" would know, not having a weapon makes for a shorter sentence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2017, 02:40 PM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,222,978 times
Reputation: 12102
Fry her.

The others got what they deserved.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2017, 02:45 PM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,396 posts, read 60,592,880 times
Reputation: 61012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
I actually didn't focus correctly on this.

this question isn't pertinent
Q:Why would they take those items the first time? (this is how I was incorrectly talking about the issue)
A: In case some one was there.


this question is pertinent
Q:Why would they take those items the second time? (this is what I assume you are talking about)
A: They "almost had to know", at a minimum, that the chances increased that some one was there.

A "professional criminal" would know, not having a weapon makes for a shorter sentence.


If you read the link about the woman's interview, she and the others had already broken into an accessory apartment/building on the property earlier that night.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-31-2017, 02:55 PM
 
4,491 posts, read 2,225,955 times
Reputation: 1992
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnesthesiaMD View Post
She was an accomplice to a crime that lead to the deaths of 3 people. What other charge would you prefer?
How the **** is this even a question?

Did she kill people? No... then you can't charge her with murder. Period. If you do this, you oppose justice and are a worse person than the actual murderers. I actually mean that. It's basically saying words have no meaning and justice is irrelevant. People are dead and someone must go to jail. The ends are justifying means and I don't want a justice system like that. She was an accomplice in a crime. THAT'S her crime. Not murder.

And I'm not an idiot. She won't get convicted. She won't plea guilty and this won't go to trial. This exists as leverage to get her to take a lesser charge but possibly one greater than she actually deserves. That's it's own form of injustice, but people don't care anymore. They see her as a bad person so who cares if we throw our values aside to give her what she deserves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:22 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top