Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-06-2017, 05:56 AM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,396 posts, read 60,575,206 times
Reputation: 61012

Advertisements

Funny how this comes up whenever a Republican, going back to Eisenhower, becomes President. If I were the cynical sort I'd say it was nothing more than sour grapes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-06-2017, 06:03 AM
 
27,214 posts, read 46,754,781 times
Reputation: 15667
Quote:
Originally Posted by bawac34618 View Post
In the wake of Trump, I think we need to take a serious look at a new amendment to the Constitution. I am sure Democrats would support this and Republicans would as well under a normal administration (they would oppose it under Trump).

A) Any candidate running for President of the United States must have either held a public office or served in the military at some point in their life prior to running for President. That public office can be a national level, state level, or municipal level office, but any candidate should have served at some point in their past. Any branch of military service would also suffice.

B) Presidential cabinet appointees must have either held a public office, served in the military, or worked in the private sector in a position that is related to the cabinet position they are being appointed to.

I believe this will safeguard us from ever having another President as incompetent and "in over his head" as this one. What do you think?
What a BS ! Just because the Democrats didn't succeed with their dirty media and other low life tricks to get Hillary chosen, a democrat wants the constitution to be changed.

Get a life and stay in bed if you can't handle life as it is!
Snowflakes are melting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2017, 06:08 AM
 
4,156 posts, read 4,175,096 times
Reputation: 2076
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yuptag View Post
Horrible idea. All you would get are pandering career politicians or right-wing hawks.

The system worked just fine. The Democrats did this to themselves. If Bernie had not been cheated out of the nomination, Trump would never have been President. People wanted change and the Democrats ran a pandering status-quo candidate.
That is exactly right. If the left held a fair race, Bernie would have won. Bernie too help Trump by coming out to support Hillary even through he knew left handed her the nomination. If Bernie say F Hillary, I don't even think Trump will get the nomination.

This is a direct response to the career politicians from the people of the US
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2017, 06:16 AM
 
12,270 posts, read 11,331,859 times
Reputation: 8066
Quote:
Originally Posted by North Beach Person View Post
Funny how this comes up whenever a Republican, going back to Eisenhower, becomes President. If I were the cynical sort I'd say it was nothing more than sour grapes.
Yup. Obama was probably the least qualified president ever but libs will never go there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2017, 06:45 AM
 
8,384 posts, read 4,367,951 times
Reputation: 11890
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dockside View Post
Yup. Obama was probably the least qualified president ever but libs will never go there.
Graduate of Harvard law school
Illinois State Senator (1997–2004)
U.S. Senator from Illinois (2005–2008)


OK ... I went there .... now where are you going with Trump? Please list all his political offices held and other qualifications please.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2017, 06:58 AM
 
21,476 posts, read 10,575,891 times
Reputation: 14128
Quote:
Originally Posted by xray731 View Post
If Biden had run - I know many Republicans that would have voted for him over Trump - we would not be having these conversations. Bernie was not going to win - he's too socialist - but Biden would have won big time over Trump.

The Republicans pushed McCain and Romney down people's throats - they didn't want either of them. The Democrats didn't learn from that and proceeded to push Hillary down our throats - people didn't want her so we have to blame our own party for the Trump presidency.
Uh, no! Biden is an idiot. You would have had to have someone really compelling to win in a change election, not the Vice President.

Biden has a lot of negatives that have been forgotten, but they would have been rehashed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2017, 08:33 AM
Status: "Smartened up and walked away!" (set 27 days ago)
 
11,788 posts, read 5,795,007 times
Reputation: 14213
I disagree katy - many people I know would have voted for him over Trump - it was their hate of Hillary that had them voting Trump. People did not see him as a continuation of Obama as much as they saw Hillary as one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2017, 08:37 AM
 
Location: Kansas
25,961 posts, read 22,120,062 times
Reputation: 26699
The requirements are fine the way they are. The Democrats want to change everything, the electoral college and now the requirements for POTUS because their candidate lost, fair and square. Will they never realize the source of the problem was their nominee? It doesn't look like it at this point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2017, 08:37 AM
 
3,138 posts, read 2,780,306 times
Reputation: 5099
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedroMartinez View Post
I think it's a horrible idea.

Career politicians has been a proven failure IMHO.
This may be true.

But Drumpf, the outsider, is doing a s^^^-poor job right now.

How many more of the non politicians do you want or propose we allow to be President, before more calamity ensues?

I'd prefer the devil I know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2017, 08:38 AM
 
3,458 posts, read 1,455,322 times
Reputation: 1755
Quote:
Originally Posted by PedroMartinez View Post
I think it's a horrible idea.

Career politicians has been a proven failure IMHO.
I agree, and I also think a presidential candidate should have a chance if they aren't wealthy. The problem is the candidates need to have money and connections to big money in order to run. In a country with the average income being $50,000 a year we'd open up our options if we clipped that requirement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:34 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top