Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-19-2017, 03:06 PM
 
Location: Twin Falls Idaho
4,996 posts, read 2,446,597 times
Reputation: 2540

Advertisements

A blow against political correctness..gotta love it:





"The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that a federal trademark law forbidding offensive names is unconstitutional.
The Court's 8-0 ruling (only new Justice Neil Gorsuch did not participate) stated that the law's so-called "disparagement clause" violates the free speech clause of the First Amendment.
The case concerned "Chinatown dance rock" band The Slants, which was denied a trademark because its name was deemed offensive.
"The commercial market is well stocked with merchandise that disparages prominent figures and groups, and the line between commercial and non-commercial speech is not always clear, as this case illustrates. If affixing the commercial label permits the suppression of any speech that may lead to political or social 'volatility,' free speech would be endangered," Justice Samuel Alito wrote"


https://a.msn.com/r/2/BBCTeRj?m=en-us
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-19-2017, 04:48 PM
 
27,214 posts, read 46,761,394 times
Reputation: 15667
Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilEyeFleegle View Post
A blow against political correctness..gotta love it:





"The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that a federal trademark law forbidding offensive names is unconstitutional.
The Court's 8-0 ruling (only new Justice Neil Gorsuch did not participate) stated that the law's so-called "disparagement clause" violates the free speech clause of the First Amendment.
The case concerned "Chinatown dance rock" band The Slants, which was denied a trademark because its name was deemed offensive.
"The commercial market is well stocked with merchandise that disparages prominent figures and groups, and the line between commercial and non-commercial speech is not always clear, as this case illustrates. If affixing the commercial label permits the suppression of any speech that may lead to political or social 'volatility,' free speech would be endangered," Justice Samuel Alito wrote"


https://a.msn.com/r/2/BBCTeRj?m=en-us
A huge blow to Obama and his "apology" for every name that has been there for decades for sports clubs that needed to be changed because Obama felt offended and tried to create an issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2017, 04:55 PM
 
Location: Twin Falls Idaho
4,996 posts, read 2,446,597 times
Reputation: 2540
Quote:
Originally Posted by bentlebee View Post
A huge blow to Obama and his "apology" for every name that has been there for decades for sports clubs that needed to be changed because Obama felt offended and tried to create an issue.
I think that that issue predates Obama...by quite a bit, actually---but we do agree---bowing and scraping to every malcontent that cobbles up an issue---is stupid.

If we deem a name offensive..just vote with your wallet. Enough of us do that..problem solved.

BTW...worst product naming strategy ever..AYDS candy..for weight loss...in the '80's
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2017, 04:55 PM
 
34,300 posts, read 15,661,250 times
Reputation: 13053
Got to love it !!! 8 to nothing ruling !!!

Everyone on the SC knows Obama was a fool.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2017, 05:22 PM
 
46,313 posts, read 27,117,053 times
Reputation: 11134
REDSKINS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hahahhaaa.....


This is great...liberals heads are exploding....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2017, 05:23 PM
 
12,638 posts, read 8,957,870 times
Reputation: 7458
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
REDSKINS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hahahhaaa.....


This is great...liberals heads are exploding....
The left will just move on to pressuring the NFL, which will cave at some point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2017, 05:25 PM
 
20,524 posts, read 15,909,938 times
Reputation: 5948
Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilEyeFleegle View Post
I think that that issue predates Obama...by quite a bit, actually---but we do agree---bowing and scraping to every malcontent that cobbles up an issue---is stupid.

If we deem a name offensive..just vote with your wallet. Enough of us do that..problem solved.

BTW...worst product naming strategy ever..AYDS candy..for weight loss...in the '80's
I'm pretty sure "Ayd's candy" was around before AIDS's.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayds
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2017, 05:27 PM
 
46,313 posts, read 27,117,053 times
Reputation: 11134
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoveToRow View Post
The left will just move on to pressuring the NFL, which will cave at some point.

Nahhhh, If I'm not mistaken, hank is coming back to the NFL....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2017, 05:29 PM
 
Location: Twin Falls Idaho
4,996 posts, read 2,446,597 times
Reputation: 2540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Packard fan View Post
I'm pretty sure "Ayd's candy" was around before AIDS's.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayds
It was....just pointin' out the ill-timed name. Forgive my attempt at humor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-19-2017, 07:57 PM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,645,820 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilEyeFleegle View Post
A blow against political correctness..gotta love it:





"The Supreme Court on Monday ruled that a federal trademark law forbidding offensive names is unconstitutional.
The Court's 8-0 ruling (only new Justice Neil Gorsuch did not participate) stated that the law's so-called "disparagement clause" violates the free speech clause of the First Amendment.
The case concerned "Chinatown dance rock" band The Slants, which was denied a trademark because its name was deemed offensive.
"The commercial market is well stocked with merchandise that disparages prominent figures and groups, and the line between commercial and non-commercial speech is not always clear, as this case illustrates. If affixing the commercial label permits the suppression of any speech that may lead to political or social 'volatility,' free speech would be endangered," Justice Samuel Alito wrote"


https://a.msn.com/r/2/BBCTeRj?m=en-us

Scalia would be so proud.... 8-0, it must have been a very compelling case and argument.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:10 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top