Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So if your job suddenly gave you a new duty that you found extremely immoral, you would have no problem just quitting immediately huh? Yours is the typical cold and indifferent liberal response.
Hells yes. When they asked me to falsify my time sheets so they could over bill the client, that is exactly what I did. Good grief. What else would a person do?
You are hypocrite on this issue. Using force to stop people from getting married bad. Using force to make people accept that same marriage good.
Kim Davis wasn't being forced go into work every morning and not only refuse to do her job, but forbid those who worked under her from also doing their jobs. She was free at any point to say, you know what? I don't believe in this, so I can't do this job any longer.
Nope. Instead, Ms. Davis thought it was her right to refuse to obey the law, and her right to refuse to allow anyone else to obey the law as well.
Ms. Davis has since been shown she was wrong. And there will be consequences.
I agree. We don't even elect a president who doesn't prove they're Christian enough in this country.
Yet we will sue a Christian woman who doesn't believe in gay marriage?
No. Someone will sue a person for violating their rights in the application of their job.
Hells yes. When they asked me to falsify my time sheets so they could over bill the client, that is exactly what I did. Good grief. What else would a person do?
lmao "What else would a person do?" How about being honest?
Are you such a bad worker where you feel that you are lucky to work in that job and couldn't find work in an honest company?
That's the rub. She was told it was a state issue and since Kentucky had outlawed it she need not worry. Not having another person to authorize a government legal marriage is just another example of government being inefficient.
Kentucky's law was overturned by the Supreme Court. After fighting it she was then told that she didn't have to issue it herself but to have others in her office issue the license, which she also refused.
If you can't do your job, why should you be allowed to remain in that job? Why should the people of Kentucky pay Kim Davis for a job she refused to perform?
In other words, you support government tyranny. That's why the 1st amendment was created. So that the government could not force people to do anything that would violate their religious beliefs. Just because you work for an employee or government job does not mean that you have to check your religious liberty at the door. Accommodations can be made, but your side says to either put up or get out. That's fast tracking to tyranny and it's anti-America.
lmao "What else would a person do?" How about being honest?
Are you such a bad worker where you feel that you are lucky to work in that job and couldn't find work in an honest company?
No. I left and found a job at an honest company. Did you misunderstand what I wrote? It seems so.
In Jeff's world, an employee being told to stop actively preventing the functionality of the job they are in charge of from being able to be executed is tyranny. Ok.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
