Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Would 'Single Payer' healthcare be sustainable in the U.S. on a National level?
Yes 121 71.18%
No 49 28.82%
Voters: 170. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-06-2017, 10:18 AM
 
Location: SoCal
20,160 posts, read 12,791,210 times
Reputation: 16993

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by JIMANDTHOM View Post
You can almost say the Federal Employees Health Benefits are like a single payer.


There are a couple of dozen policies to choose from(some are restricted due to union membership etc--letter carriers as an example. These may also be a couple of HMO styles, not certain without going to look on OPM site.


The bulk of the policies available are national in the coverage for the same rate whether Maine-Michigan-Montana.
Hmm! No it's employer's health plan. They paid people less and the money goes to benefits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-06-2017, 10:19 AM
 
1,156 posts, read 944,288 times
Reputation: 3599
The current system isn't sustainable. Single payer theoretically would be better. Once our corrupt politicians get involved though...it becomes doubtful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2017, 10:19 AM
 
Location: SoCal
20,160 posts, read 12,791,210 times
Reputation: 16993
Quote:
Originally Posted by ottomobeale View Post
Private health insurance is not sustainable.

Single payer. 6% employee 6% employer. Covers dollars 1 to 200 and dollars 2700+. Double for families. Everyone on it, even unions and congress. It doesnt make care free but no more ruined for life million dollar bills.

Private sector can provide gap insurance if you want it.
Make sure you understand what single payer means. Only 4 countries in the world have single payer. I think Britain is one of them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2017, 10:21 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,201 posts, read 44,965,842 times
Reputation: 13747
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewbieHere View Post
Even for state like California, it's a long shot. Brown has already said there is no money for it.
How can that be when California has the world's 6th largest economy?

https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/a...argest-economy
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2017, 10:23 AM
 
Location: SoCal
20,160 posts, read 12,791,210 times
Reputation: 16993
Quote:
Originally Posted by Independentthinking View Post
Of course they do, and this conversation is a broken record. It's just that silly liberal math. Any middle class family living in a high cost of living area, would end up paying anywhere from $8k to $10k a year more for health care thanks to the income taxes in those larger countries like the UK, Germany, and France.. And I'm guessing they're not going to go for that. Most people just get into cherry picking when it comes to this conversation. It's not even worth an argument. But now that you brought it up, your thread will end up being about 20 pages long or more. And it all will be nothing but gibberish. The only people that would benefit from single payer are the 10% in this country that are not covered by either a government plan or their employers plan.
More like 4% with pre-existing conditions without government or employers plan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2017, 10:26 AM
 
Location: SoCal
20,160 posts, read 12,791,210 times
Reputation: 16993
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCALMike View Post
Which onerous regulations on the health care industry does the US have that Australia and the UK do not have?

The health of the US population isnt the issue. The UK is the second least healthiest country in the developed world. Very overweight. And....pretty much the lowest health care costs in the developed world. Australia is also rock bottom when it comes to costs while being much fatter than most other developed countries.
You forgot the public transportation in UK makes everybody walk by design. My in laws used very little of the healthcare system in the U.K. Only the last two years of their lives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2017, 10:29 AM
 
14,221 posts, read 6,981,533 times
Reputation: 6059
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Nonsense? Read it
Yes, nonsense. Average is meaningless.

The average of Joe Sixpack and Bill Gates is $1 billion per year. Its meaningless to argue that $7 an hour Alabama McDonalds workers should accept a 35% sales tax because $18 an hour Danish McDonalds workers accept a 25% sales tax.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2017, 10:29 AM
 
34,094 posts, read 17,157,211 times
Reputation: 17241
Quote:
Originally Posted by JIMANDTHOM View Post
What do you mean by sustainable?


What is your criteria to be yay or nay.
Financially sustainable, where major insurers do not leave, as they have been for a long time. Where they do not lose their shirt on ACA until they wise up and flee.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2017, 10:32 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,201 posts, read 44,965,842 times
Reputation: 13747
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCALMike View Post
Yes, nonsense. Average is meaningless.
Then so is the average cost of health insurance/care. Don't get sick = low cost

See what I mean? You can't ignore a statistic that you don't like unless everyone else can do the same.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-06-2017, 10:36 AM
 
14,221 posts, read 6,981,533 times
Reputation: 6059
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewbieHere View Post
You forgot the public transportation in UK makes everybody walk by design. My in laws used very little of the healthcare system in the U.K. Only the last two years of their lives.
Not really. Car density in the UK is very high.

Obesity by country:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...ass_Index_(BMI)

Notice how Australia has 28.6% obesity rate, UK is similar, America has a 33.7% obesity rate and Japan has a 3.3% obesity rate.

So Australia and UK are similar, America slightly higher, Japan on another planet.

What about health care costs in these countries? There is no link to obesity at all. Australia and New Zealand have pretty much the lowest health care costs in the developed world. Their obesity rates are some of the highest in the developed world.

You guys are just clutching at straws trying to defend the current corrupt system we have. Why do you carry their water? The lobbyists and insurance corporations dont care about you. Why do you care so much about them?

Last edited by PCALMike; 05-06-2017 at 10:46 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top