Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-08-2017, 11:39 PM
 
23,654 posts, read 17,514,296 times
Reputation: 7472

Advertisements

LateTermAbortion: Exposed: 30 Week Late Term Abortion in New Mexico

http://www.priestsforlife.org/media/...02#topofscreen

They will do abortions up to 30-33 weeks. Healthy baby, healthy mother. Shameful. The woman has to go through labor anyway so why not deliver the child? Many women have given up their child for adoption when they cannot afford to keep the child.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-08-2017, 11:52 PM
 
Location: My House
34,938 posts, read 36,264,326 times
Reputation: 26552
Quote:
Originally Posted by janelle144 View Post
LateTermAbortion: Exposed: 30 Week Late Term Abortion in New Mexico

LateTermAbortion: Exposed 33 Week Late Term Abortion In New Mexico

They will do abortions up to 30-33 weeks. Healthy baby, healthy mother. Shameful. The woman has to go through labor anyway so why not deliver the child? Many women have given up their child for adoption when they cannot afford to keep the child.
No. They will not. Jesus Christ. Stop posting blatant lies.

A fetus is viable outside the womb by 30 weeks. In fact, viability in New Mexico is set prior to 28 weeks.

https://www.abqjournal.com/743253?#_=_

"Of New Mexico’s five abortion clinics, only Albuquerque’s Southwest Women’s Options offers abortions up to 28 weeks and on a case-by-case basis after that if fetal anomalies are discovered or a mother’s health is in jeopardy, according to its website."
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2017, 11:57 PM
 
23,654 posts, read 17,514,296 times
Reputation: 7472
Tell them, not me. I guess you don't believe your lying ears.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2017, 12:05 AM
 
Location: London
12,275 posts, read 7,140,056 times
Reputation: 13661
I'm a liberal, and I'm all for banning abortion after 20 weeks max (unless carrying the baby to term after that would pose a risk to the mother). By then, you long KNOW you're pregnant. You can detect congenital abnormalities. It's when the fetus starts developing the nervous system (and would hence then be able to physically feel).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2017, 12:09 AM
 
23,654 posts, read 17,514,296 times
Reputation: 7472
Quote:
Originally Posted by ohhwanderlust View Post
I'm a liberal, and I'm all for banning abortion after 20 weeks max (unless carrying the baby to term after that would pose a risk to the mother). By then, you long KNOW you're pregnant. You can detect congenital abnormalities. It's when the fetus starts developing the nervous system (and would hence then be able to physically feel).
Do you agree with aborting healthy babies that far along or before that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2017, 12:16 AM
 
Location: London
12,275 posts, read 7,140,056 times
Reputation: 13661
Quote:
Originally Posted by janelle144 View Post
Do you agree with aborting healthy babies that far along or before that?
I'm pro-choice up until 12 weeks. After that, I'm against it for healthy babies. After 20 weeks, I'm against it almost universally (the exception being risk to the mother). Too bad so sad, should've made up your mind.

Abortion is definitely a sad thing though. We need to catch up with the rest of the world and get rid of the stigma against inserting IUDs into childfree women so that they can have reliable long-term birth control and not ever need abortion.

I've tried to get an IUD myself, and it was very difficult to find one that would agree to insert one in a married 24yo woman without kids (despite me emphatically telling them that we don't want kids until I'm at least 30).

Other contraceptives either have a high failure rate or wreak hormonal havoc on the body.

Last edited by ohhwanderlust; 05-09-2017 at 12:24 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2017, 12:33 AM
 
23,654 posts, read 17,514,296 times
Reputation: 7472
I thought that was what PP was for---handing out all types of birth control.

Also, no birth control is 100% that is why PP says it needs abortions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2017, 12:47 AM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,375,883 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by janelle144 View Post
LateTermAbortion: Exposed: 30 Week Late Term Abortion in New Mexico

LateTermAbortion: Exposed 33 Week Late Term Abortion In New Mexico

They will do abortions up to 30-33 weeks. Healthy baby, healthy mother. Shameful. The woman has to go through labor anyway so why not deliver the child? Many women have given up their child for adoption when they cannot afford to keep the child.
They arent posting your nonsense here. YOU are. Stop posting lies. Thats on you. Bearing false witness.

There ARE things to say against abortion, go ahead. But stop lying.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2017, 01:36 AM
 
23,654 posts, read 17,514,296 times
Reputation: 7472
The truth is on the phone call, if you have a problem with it then tell "priests for life" that posted it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2017, 01:47 AM
 
Location: CO/UT/AZ/NM Catch me if you can!
6,927 posts, read 6,938,652 times
Reputation: 16509
Quote:
Originally Posted by janelle144 View Post
The truth is on the phone call, if you have a problem with it then tell "priests for life" that posted it.
And you are the one who re-posted that lie here. If you want us to take you seriously then you need to cite reputable sources. You cannot cite lies and then state that the mis-truths are the problem of the ones who originally threw them out there on the Internet. You are helping to spread lies and rumors. It's a common tactic that is used by those with nothing of substance to support their stance - don't expect us to fawn all over you for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:51 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top