Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 05-12-2017, 01:31 PM
 
12,997 posts, read 13,650,642 times
Reputation: 11192

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by SophieLL View Post
According to opinions i ve been reading in other threads in this forum, it seems that people here seem to assume WOMEN are responsible for raising kids for the most part. They might have a job or work few hours but they expect them to do the most part of the raising. They assume its gonna be like that. I get it, this is a highly conservative forum, and those are for the traditional values of family, etc.

But if you think like that, can you justify it? Is it from a biological point of view? Purely social? Why?
I'm one of the few liberal members of this highly (aka extremist) conservative forum, but I pretty much do think that women tend to more of the child rearing than men. I think women tend to gravitate more to children than men probably due to their biology.

 
Old 05-12-2017, 01:33 PM
 
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
5,874 posts, read 10,533,552 times
Reputation: 4494
Quote:
Originally Posted by WestCobb View Post
I'm one of the few liberal members of this highly (aka extremist) conservative forum, but I pretty much do think that women tend to more of the child rearing than men. I think women tend to gravitate more to children than men probably due to their biology.
You mean is a biological instinct instead of a social construct?
 
Old 05-12-2017, 01:33 PM
 
13,898 posts, read 6,450,477 times
Reputation: 6960
Quote:
Originally Posted by SophieLL View Post
Why is it almost always the mother?
IDK, nature seemed to have made it that way. Why is it the female in the animal kingdom taking care of the offspring for the most part? Could it be that the mother is the one that produces the milk and makes the "nest" so to speak?
 
Old 05-12-2017, 01:33 PM
 
Location: Posting from my space yacht.
8,447 posts, read 4,756,035 times
Reputation: 15354
Quote:
Originally Posted by SophieLL View Post
Why is it almost always the mother?
Because women have little respect for men who are not gainfully employed.
 
Old 05-12-2017, 01:34 PM
 
13,898 posts, read 6,450,477 times
Reputation: 6960
Quote:
Originally Posted by SophieLL View Post
You mean is a biological instinct instead of a social construct?
Of course it's a biological instinct. It has been since life rearing began.
 
Old 05-12-2017, 01:36 PM
 
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
5,874 posts, read 10,533,552 times
Reputation: 4494
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dbones View Post
Of course it's a biological instinct. It has been since life rearing began.
Science has proven for a long time that the so called "maternal instict" is a social construct.

Yes, we can bear children in our bellys and have the abilty to produce milk.

But, other than that, we are not naturally better at raising children than men
 
Old 05-12-2017, 01:37 PM
 
36,539 posts, read 30,885,552 times
Reputation: 32824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dbones View Post
IDK, nature seemed to have made it that way. Why is it the female in the animal kingdom taking care of the offspring for the most part? Could it be that the mother is the one that produces the milk and makes the "nest" so to speak?
In many species (other than mammals) the "father" cares exclusively for the young or helps care for the young. One can not compare humans to other animals, the animal kingdom is too diverse.
 
Old 05-12-2017, 01:38 PM
 
13,898 posts, read 6,450,477 times
Reputation: 6960
Quote:
Originally Posted by SophieLL View Post
Science has proven for a long time that the so called "maternal instict" is a social construct.

Yes, we can bear children in our bellys and have the abilty to produce milk.

But, other than that, we are not naturally better at raising children than men
No science didn't prove that. That's BS. What social construct tells the female animal to do the rearing for the most part? Humans are animals too in case you were wondering.
 
Old 05-12-2017, 01:41 PM
 
13,898 posts, read 6,450,477 times
Reputation: 6960
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2mares View Post
In many species (other than mammals) the "father" cares exclusively for the young or helps care for the young. One can not compare humans to other animals, the animal kingdom is too diverse.
Humans ARE animals. It's VERY rare that the male animal cares for the offspring exclusively. ALL animals, including humans, the male takes on a role and has responsibilities but the main one is the female when it comes to raising offspring.
 
Old 05-12-2017, 01:41 PM
 
12,997 posts, read 13,650,642 times
Reputation: 11192
Quote:
Originally Posted by SophieLL View Post
You mean is a biological instinct instead of a social construct?
I think so. Women have more nurturing instincts.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top