Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-07-2017, 05:50 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX
3,909 posts, read 2,122,366 times
Reputation: 1644

Advertisements

Id say let em defend themselves. If we are offering them defense, they have no right to say what kind. Maybe we can put that money towards the United States infrastructure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-07-2017, 05:50 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,051,710 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
That doesn't sound all that significant when their adversary spends 90% of their GDP on the military.
That would be about 3 times what NK spends, their economy is that bad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2017, 05:51 PM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,222,978 times
Reputation: 12102
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
So. Korea suspends THAAD missile deployment and wants it out. Time to get our troops out and let them defend themselves.

No need to expose out troops to risk when the So. Koreans are not willing to defend against No. Korea.
Standard liberal appeasement.

Get out of S. Korea. Milquetoasts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2017, 06:05 PM
 
34,300 posts, read 15,652,035 times
Reputation: 13053
The real story is that the Chinese put sanctions on S.K. because they don't want the missile system in S.K. because it has radars that can pick up activity in China and they see that as a threat to them. So they are being punished economically by China.
Yet they can't seem to pressure N.K. in the same way ? In the end we are on a collision course with N.K. and China.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2017, 06:22 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,371,187 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
The real story is that the Chinese put sanctions on S.K. because they don't want the missile system in S.K. because it has radars that can pick up activity in China and they see that as a threat to them. So they are being punished economically by China.
Yet they can't seem to pressure N.K. in the same way ? In the end we are on a collision course with N.K. and China.
Wish Trump recognized the threat China represents. Good thing some of his advisors do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2017, 06:29 PM
 
Location: Central Ohio
10,834 posts, read 14,936,147 times
Reputation: 16587
Quote:
Originally Posted by bagster View Post
Who would have to make the decision to pull out the troops? Could Trump alone do it, or would it take an act of congress?
I'd bet the South Koreans would do some serious crawdadding about the missiles if the US started talking pullout.
Don't talk about it just do it!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2017, 06:33 PM
 
15,531 posts, read 10,501,555 times
Reputation: 15812
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
The real story is that the Chinese put sanctions on S.K. because they don't want the missile system in S.K. because it has radars that can pick up activity in China and they see that as a threat to them. So they are being punished economically by China.
Yet they can't seem to pressure N.K. in the same way ? In the end we are on a collision course with N.K. and China.
Why would China want to pressure North Korea? By keeping things stirred up, we pour more time, energy and money into it. That's a win for China, they are not our friend. Not saying we shouldn't try and get along, but let's play smart.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2017, 06:35 PM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
39,228 posts, read 27,603,964 times
Reputation: 16067
What worries China is, actually the monitoring abilities of such defensive systems installed so close to their proximity. Means a very powerful radar outside your doorstep that will get United States the earliest warnings in case of a Chinese missile launch (hypothesis).

Nothing is going to protect S Korea, even a nuclear artillery cannon might do the job of flattening Seoul.

All these said, Not sure why P.R China is worrying, Oh wait, maybe they are not worrying, but like some annoying posters, they like to bark for the sake of barking because barking at America is what they do.

China’s own partner - Russia, of all countries - agreed to sell the highly potent S-300 and S-400 system to Vietnam, and unlike THAAD, those systems are capable of not only tracking numerous targets on their radar but also can be used to shoot down aircraft, drones and missiles.

No one recognizes China as a "Leader" what a laughable statement! China does not have a control over North Korea’s provocation or the instability of the regime, or they are not exerting that control for political reasons.

China is not offering real alternatives to THAAD. They are just annoyed by how powerful it is.

Deep down, no one is really worrying.

If you want to talk about history, well,

1) China supported North Korea, along with Soviet Union to invade South Korea to start Korean War.
2) Korea would have been unified without Kim hadn’t PLA invaded Korea.
3) North Korea has been threatening with ballistic missiles and not artillery missiles. THAAD is a defense against those threats.

Current government of China is very different from the one in 1950s, and South Korea has built a rapport with China since then. S.K does not want to lose China as the biggest expert market. But the situation is complicated. I don't think anybody are interested in a war. It is all about power and balance, politics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:02 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top