Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
In Thursday’s letter, Nunes said the total requests for Americans’ names by Obama political aides numbered in the hundreds during Obama’s last year in office and often lacked a specific intelligence community justification. He called the lack of proper justifications a “serious deficiency.”
Can someone please try to justify this?
Quote:
“The committee has learned that one official, whose position had no apparent intelligence related function, made hundreds of unmasking requests during the final year of the Obama administration,” Nunes wrote. “Of those requests, only one offered a justification that was not boilerplate.”
Should Obama be forced to testify to answer these grave charges?
Citizens don't care about former presidents. Why bother going after the former president when drudging up the past would be a distraction of resources and time? The government has enough stupid distractions! The former president is irrelevant.
From Nunes to Coats - " We have found evidence that current and former government officials had easy access to U.S. person information and that it is possible that they used this information to achieve partisan political purposes, including the selective, anonymous leaking of such information,” Nunes wrote in the letter to Coats"
Citizens don't care about former presidents. Why bother going after the former president when drudging up the past would be a distraction of resources and time? The government has enough stupid distractions! The former president is irrelevant.
You can't be serious....2008-2016...Obama blamed Bush for just about everything and yes citizens care.
Citizens don't care about former presidents. Why bother going after the former president when drudging up the past would be a distraction of resources and time? The government has enough stupid distractions! The former president is irrelevant.
Citizens don't care about former presidents. Why bother going after the former president when drudging up the past would be a distraction of resources and time? The government has enough stupid distractions! The former president is irrelevant.
The biggest traitor in US history, Barack Obama, is NOT a distraction and he NEEDS to be held accountable for his crimes, which are many.
From Nunes to Coats - " We have found evidence that current and former government officials had easy access to U.S. person information and that it is possible that they used this information to achieve partisan political purposes, including the selective, anonymous leaking of such information,” Nunes wrote in the letter to Coats"
Get ready libs, this will be ugly.
My fear is that the Republican Establishment won't cover for the investigators just like they didn't when going after Lois Lerner. The GOP Establishment doesn't want the Democrats to fail because they know full well that they'll be next and that someone will run a third party to beat them and they'll go the way of the Whig Party.
Right now the Republican Senate chairman or some higher up isn't even backing the investigator guy.
Are people still believing anything that Nunez has to say?
The guy is still carrying Trump's water.
Republicans are busy trying to trash Obama, Clinton, Lynch, Comey, James Baker, Mueller, ...
Perhaps if they would try focusing on governing rather than covering for Trump, things might work out better.
Who knows?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.