Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The bottom line for me is that this President may be in too deep with a geopolitical adversary and compromised. That's far different then just being a successful businessman. Anyone who turns a blind eye to that is despicable.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,400,252 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by PilgrimsProgress
And yet vendors clamor to do business with the Trump Organization because if they do good work at a good price on time, he will hire them again and again. When they bid other jobs for other developers, they will get serious consideration because they satisfied Trump who is a perfectionist.
I'll note the complete lack of evidence supporting what in reality is your opinion and nothing else.
An opinion the number of well documented lawsuits against Trump by people seeking payment rightfully theirs would seem to refute.
But this is all immaterial anyway. Almost all our Presidents have come from great family wealth and power, or from military prominence and its power. There are very few exceptions, and they can be numbered on the fingers of one hand.
Couldn't resist counting: Obama, Clinton, Carter, LBJ, Truman, ran out of fingers. IOW every Dem President in my lifetime except JFK is an exception.
Unfortunately, in George Washington's time, slavery was a common, and legal practice. Was it wrong, and those that practiced it misguided by society's norms? Yes. However, we can not judge the past through the prism of the present. To do so is very naïve, and misleading. There are many common practices in the past that are now considered wrong. Those people were a product of their times, nothing more nothing less.
An interesting story about General Washington that I read years ago (I could not find my original source, so cite two I found now).
When the Continental Congress offered Mr. Washington the position of Commander in Chief of the army, they offered him a salary of $500.00 per month. For the length of the war, it would have been $48,000.00.
General Washington refused the salary, to the admiration of all, saying that he only wanted to be reimbursed for his expenses at the end of the war. Congress agreed.
George also offered to serve as the first President of the United States on the same terms: no salary, just reimburse me for my expenses. Congress, however, insisted on a firm, fixed salary.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.