Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well, I'm against that. The government has no business stopping or questioning you in such a manner with no actual cause.
Are you 100% on that's what they did or is it just your memory?
I'm 100% sure - there wouldn't have been a finding of contempt today if that hadn't been the case.
But there is plenty of contemporaneous coverage of events going back to the initial trial in 2012 (probably before that too, really) that you can easily google to refresh your memory.
I'm 100% sure - there wouldn't have been a finding of contempt today if that hadn't been the case.
But there is plenty of contemporaneous coverage of events going back to the initial trial in 2012 (probably before that too, really) that you can easily google to refresh your memory.
Not necessarily; a judge can do practically anything, but that judge can be overruled.
If you're 100%, that's good enough for me. I'm glad he's gone, since I don't believe in giving police such latitude and committing harassment over mere suspicion that something might be awry.
He faces up to 6 months in prison when he's sentenced in October. Of course at the rate things are going, there should be plenty of openings in a Trump administration for him after that.
He should be in pink coveralls, living in a tent city in Arizona's summer, and living on a diet of cold cereal, baloney on white bread, and water for those 6 months.
Let him have to go through the same thing he put other people through.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.