Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Ordinarily I would say let it go but with the way the Left is still hammering on Trump then Hillary and her cronies should be investigated as well.
I just have a feeling that if the investigation is done properly and not hyped by the media and played out in the court of public opinion that we will see that Clinton had much more dirt on her then Trump ever thought of.
The Dems might not like what we find at the bottom of the "collusion" pit.
Good. Either it will be found that there is nothing wrong or that Hillary and company are rotten. I doubt that anything will happen. Both parties are up to their eyeballs in the same slime. This is a circus to distract the masses.
Keep in mind, if it HADN'T been for the Benghazi hearings, we would NEVER have found out about her private server and the classified material she received, had and sent form it.
I know, you DON"T CARE about national security and her breaking classified material laws.
Ordinarily I would say let it go but with the way the Left is still hammering on Trump then Hillary and her cronies should be investigated as well.
I just have a feeling that if the investigation is done properly and not hyped by the media and played out in the court of public opinion that we will see that Clinton had much more dirt on her then Trump ever thought of.
The Dems might not like what we find at the bottom of the "collusion" pit.
You are overly optimistic based on prior house investigations. This is ridiculous, Comey has already subjected to hearings and has answered questions. So why did the house choose this moment to investigate Clinton, they had ample time last year to start yet another Clinton investigation and they were in charge.
This is pure politics and a waste of their time, the vote was right along party lines, no surprise.
Yeah, this should turn out real well.
Quote:
Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), another sponsor, suggested a probe of Comey’s interactions with sources, the Obama administration, and especially former attorney general Loretta E. Lynch. After referring to part of the amendment that asked for documents about Lynch’s tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton in Phoenix, just a few days before her FBI interview, Jordan argued that Comey also needed to explain why he followed apparent advice from Lynch to call the Clinton email probe a “matter” instead of an investigation.
Last edited by Goodnight; 07-31-2017 at 10:23 AM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
