Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What we need to remember though, The KKK, BLM, and Antifa were ALL ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEMOCRAT PARTY! As well as the black panthers, CAIR, La Raza, the American communist party, and the socialist party USA.
you are right, the DNC is going down in flames. They are the weakest they have been in 100 years. And yet, they are too stupid to realize it.
If Trump manages to not start nuclear Armageddon, Democrats will eventually retake power. Demographics are on their side, and even if they weren't, the country always goes back and forth at the top. After this experience with an all-Republican government, the people may be reluctant to try that again for some time.
What we need to remember though, The KKK, BLM, and Antifa were ALL ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEMOCRAT PARTY! As well as the black panthers, CAIR, La Raza, the American communist party, and the socialist party USA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbcmh81
Got any facts from this century?
I always appreciate when Trumpeter post stuff like this b/c it simply highlights to the adults in theorem on both sides that they have little clue of what they speak...although that never stops them from forming absolute opinions....
Shucks, Molly. Osama Bin Laden never did anything to me, personally. Neither has Charles Manson. And Hitler was never found guilty of anything. Should we all just wait until we, personally are injured?
Context is key. Context gives meaning to expressed thought. Lifting a thought from context and using it elsewhere, for your own purpose, changes it from the meaning of the original thought to your own.
FOR EXAMPLE:
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101
maybe the Trump cultists are just vile, racist filth, and have only themselves to blame?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener2307
Oh, we Trumpees are TOTALLY to blame!
SEE HOW THAT WORKS? Or does this fit your original meaning without any qualification/clarification?
I was responding to the specific intimations of personal knowledge and personal feeling by the poster about how Hillary thinks or feels about specific things and about the "classy" suggestion ( HEAVY SARCASM HERE) as to what she should do. I.e.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PilgrimsProgress
If she was smart she'd commit suicide and save taxpayers a lot of money.
No mention was made, "within the context" of the post to which I was responding, to Osama Bin Laden nor to Charles Manson. And there's no equivalency, for me, in what I was saying, to your examples. IFyou would like to create some kind of equivalency between the post or those heinous types and Hillary, I'll leave it to you to identify and justify exactly why you feel that way. Or more likely, just toss out aspersions, insinuations, distortions, lies, disinformation, rumors, suspicions and smears. The general smorgasbord of non-specifics usually thrown at Hillary by those who have chosen not to like her for whatever reason. Sounds like you have an answer in mind for your query, so, have at it.
The Hillary/Obama diversion always gives Trumpers a nice break from having to deal with the outrageous and despicable behaviors of their chosen one.
you are right, the DNC is going down in flames. They are the weakest they have been in 100 years. And yet, they are too stupid to realize it.
Talk is cheap. In point of fact, with some sources, so cheap it's just completely worthless.
The great thing is, if people are allowed to flap their lips or tap their keyboards long enough, the tables turn.
False, inflated pride goeth before the fall. Almost makes it worth the wait. Not quite, but almost.
Flukes happen. Flukes get rectified. Until then, fluke on.
We would not be seeing Nazis crawling out from under rocks if she or ANYONE other than Drumpf were in The White House.
Exactly! We would have been more at peace, there would have already been steps toward positive change and would not have been suffering with or spending time discussing HIM.
Essentially, since you don't like the outcome, you feel the system should be changed.
BTW, if the system was based on popular votes, voting would have been different and there is no way to know for sure if she would have received the most votes.
I don't like the split outcome. I think it is not good for the country when we have someone voted into office who does not hold the majority of votes of all citizens.
Your "By the way" is absolutely correct. Because we used the Electoral College method in the 2016 election, we don't know whether Hillary Clinton would have still won by popular vote. If majority vote only led to a victory for a candidate, BOTH PARTIES, in fact ALL PARTIES, could and would have strategized differently. That might have led to a Trump victory or a Clinton victory.
Because I am a hopeful person who believes that Hillary Clinton is the far better leader to hold the office of the Presidency, I hope she would have still won by popular vote. Her temperament is better for the job and she is significantly smarter than dumb Trump and she is widely respected around the world for all her abilities and accomplishments. In addition to his being a narcissist, I believe Trump has dementia.
You are correct that I didn't like the outcome, but it's not because a Republican won, rather that the single worst person to ever hold the office of President, a real criminal who thinks he is above everyone else, is there with the nuclear codes. Trump is a racist buffoon who only seeks adoration. That's why he likes campaign mode and hates actually working.
There were some decent Republican candidates, but Trump's wealthy Russian and other ties, his money, his talking out of both sides of his mouth, his angry thumbing his nose at the system, appealed to those too stupid to understand the danger of the man.
He'll be gone soon, but I am no longer comforted by Pence being there in the background to take over, because Pence did not stand up to Trump after Charlotteseville. I wish that Trump had selected someone else as Veep, because it is highly likely that Trump will not finish his first term and we'll probably have to accept Pence as President.
Back to my main issue: I think changing the method by which we choose the President, i.e. popular vote versus electoral college, is an essential step for us to take to ensure that the person who wins is chosen by "one person, one vote".
Trump and George W. Bush didn't start off well in large part because their opposing candidate beat them by popular vote, so there was no clear majority and people were rightfully angry.
So we need to change the system before 2020. Then whoever wins, wins.
Last edited by SFBayBoomer; 08-17-2017 at 10:09 PM..
I don't like the split outcome. I think it is not good for the country when we have someone voted into office who does not hold the majority of votes of all citizens.
Your "By the way" is absolutely correct. Because we used the Electoral College method in the 2016 election, we don't know whether Hillary Clinton would have still won by popular vote. If majority vote only led to a victory for a candidate, BOTH PARTIES, in fact ALL PARTIES, could and would have strategized differently. That might have led to a Trump victory or a Clinton victory.
Because I am a hopeful person who believes that Hillary Clinton is the far better leader to hold the office of the Presidency, I hope she would have still won by popular vote. Her temperament is better for the job and she is significantly smarter than dumb Trump and she is widely respected around the world for all her abilities and accomplishments. In addition to his being a narcissist, I believe Trump has dementia.
You are correct that I didn't like the outcome, but it's not because a Republican won, rather that the single worst person to ever hold the office of President, a real criminal who thinks he is above everyone else, is there with the nuclear codes. Trump is a racist buffoon who only seeks adoration. That's why he likes campaign mode and hates actually working.
There were some decent Republican candidates, but Trump's wealthy Russian and other ties, his money, his talking out of both sides of his mouth, his angry thumbing his nose at the system, appealed to those too stupid to understand the danger of the man.
He'll be gone soon, but I am no longer comforted by Pence being there in the background to take over, because Pence did not stand up to Trump after Charlotteseville. I wish that Trump had selected someone else as Veep, because it is highly likely that Trump will not finish his first term and we'll probably have to accept Pence as President.
Back to my main issue: I think changing the method by which we choose the President, i.e. popular vote versus electoral college, is an essential step for us to take to ensure that the person who wins is chosen by "one person, one vote".
Trump and George W. Bush didn't start off well in large part because their opposing candidate beat them by popular vote, so there was no clear majority and people were rightfully angry.
So we need to change the system before 2020. Then whoever wins, wins.
Trump will be gone, in 7.5 years
Last edited by CaseyB; 08-18-2017 at 04:24 AM..
Reason: Rude
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
