Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-16-2017, 12:48 PM
 
Location: SC
8,793 posts, read 8,166,453 times
Reputation: 12992

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
But wasn't slavery legal at the time? Not to defend slavery but what makes it so horrid for men to take up arms in defense of a legal right? Many of those men also served in the US Army prior to the Civil War too, it's not as if they were outside agitators who'd never served their country.

IMO all this energetic outrage over decades old inanimate objects would be better used to protest things that affect us today like involvement in asinine wars of choice of no benefit to the US. Think what you will but those statues cause no harm.
To answer your question... again context... If a statue included a man whipping people existed and had been originally commissioned to 'honor' Horatio P. Slaveholder for his act of creating the town of "Saveholderville" in the middle of the 16th century when slave holding was legal and seen by the general public as normal activity, and Mr. Slaveholder had also been recognized for putting down a slave revolt, then I'd say it would not be unheard of to find such statues. But since 500+ years have passed and we are modern civilized people who recognize that slave holding is an immoral, reprehensible, and and inhuman act, then people would see no value in that status and out of shame demolish it. Even if it had artistic merit, I would bet that most would want it destroyed for what it represents.

Arguing and the energy being spent fighting over these confederate status is (to me) a similar issue. But it is not just about the statues. it is also about what they represent and what that representation says about our society. The statues are a symptom of a huge problem far more than innocuous - and getting rid of them is more than just a protest. This is one step in remediation of a this country's birth sin. A sin that is just as troubling as any other issue we face. That is why removal of these statues are causing such an uproar.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-16-2017, 12:49 PM
 
7 posts, read 3,218 times
Reputation: 15
Because we move forward and don't let the past affect us
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2017, 12:49 PM
 
Location: Santa Monica
36,853 posts, read 17,368,921 times
Reputation: 14459
Quote:
Originally Posted by T0103E View Post
I agree with the bold. End the state immediately!
LOL.

You find one line in all this mess and run with it.

Typical anarchist.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2017, 12:50 PM
 
991 posts, read 1,110,414 times
Reputation: 843
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbohm View Post
i think people need to tone down the hate and vitriol against the southern leaders of a legally formed COUNTRY.
They lost, so they really have no right to dictate the terms in how they are regarded. So, in the end who is the special snowflake? I think it's the people that demand respect for a failed state that deserves be relegated to the dustbin of history?

Face it: America is changing. Demographically, culturally, economically. It always has been changing. It's about keeping up with the times.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2017, 12:50 PM
 
Location: Madison, WI
5,302 posts, read 2,355,944 times
Reputation: 1230
Quote:
Originally Posted by no_recess View Post
lol.

You find one line in all this mess and run with it.

Typical anarchist.

:d
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2017, 12:51 PM
 
Location: Virginia
10,093 posts, read 6,436,538 times
Reputation: 27661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
They weren't fighting for slavery. Why can't you understand people were fighting for country?
As if the north cared about the health and welfare of blacks. The north was racist. They didn't care about freedom for blacks or did you miss the riots in New York over not wanting to fight for blacks?
This is an important concept. In truth, many soldiers of the South were fighting more for their States than for the Country as a whole. Most of them had never been outside of their own community in their entire lives, not to mention their own state. The state was the primary political identifier for each organized troop; just look at the monuments at Gettysburg.

Many of the regular soldiers were also raised alongside blacks, and never owned black people in their lives. They simply couldn't afford to, nor would they have even then. In many rural communities blacks and whites lived in close quarters and had trade, etc. That didn't exist as openly in the North, where racism was touted as being bad but was still practiced in reality. We need to realize that there was not a clear system of "North wanted to free the slaves = good" v "South wanted slavery = bad" at all.

Another thing people need to realize is that not only soldiers, but the general populace, actually revered military leaders like Robert E. Lee. He was born the next county over from mine and his birthplace is still hugely popular. The man was loved by so many as an honorable soldier and man. You can take down a statue of him, but that's not going to change the history and the reverence, and may do more harm than good. In the long run, how on earth does a piece of wrought metal hurt someone anyway? SMDH.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2017, 12:51 PM
 
51,654 posts, read 25,828,130 times
Reputation: 37889
Quote:
Originally Posted by KC_Sleuth View Post
Not true. Most of Europe had abolished slavery before 1861, as well as Canada. The southern states knew it was wrong, but remained obstinate. The US banned the Atlantic Slave Trade in the 1700s, if they did not know slavery was wrong, why would they do that?

Also, there is no room for incrementalism in a modernized society when it comes to OWNING human beings. It was a moral imperative that it had to end. Unfortunately, the south was anything but modernized. It was a pitiful, antiquated aristocracy.
The public opinion tide had turned on slavery by the time of the Civil War.

Uncle Tom's Cabin was published to considerable acclaim in 1852.

Canada and most of Europe had abolished slavery by then.

Southern states were on the wrong side of history here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2017, 12:56 PM
 
Location: Orange County/Las Vegas
2,544 posts, read 2,737,804 times
Reputation: 2519
Offensive? This word seems to get thrown around for everything these days. The confederate war is a part of the United State's past whether it offends you or not. Trying to just erase it will not happen. Both sides thought they were right at the time.
What is even worse is the fact that we wiped out all the Native Americans that lived here before us so we could take their land. It is a terrible thing we did but it is part of our past that will always remain in the history books.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2017, 12:56 PM
 
Location: SC
8,793 posts, read 8,166,453 times
Reputation: 12992
Quote:
Originally Posted by No_Recess View Post
His ability as an engineer is subjective, like anyone else at their job, no? If someone feels his accomplishments are worth it in the context of him being an engineer then that should be good enough, right?

Here's where it gets tricky in terms of history though...

He was in the U.S. Corps of Engineers prior to the Civil War. As a young engineer he worked on Cockspur Island in Georgia at Fort Pulaski.

The fort would be seized by the Confederacy and later fought over with the Union winning the battle.

So how do we feel about this one? Lee was instrumental in setting up Fort Pulaski as a UNITED STATES ENGINEER UNDER THE UNITED STATES ARMY . He also returned to the fort to help fortify it as the war began.

Plaque or monument recognizing his engineering solely for his original work on Cockspur Island?
As I said, if he was honored for significant engineering skill that would be one thing. I'd have no problem with that. I have no problem with him based on what he believed in back then. He was a man of his times. BUT, I certainly don't think he should have a place of honor based almost solely on those beliefs in a modern world that rejects slavery. Times change. His thoughts and values of 150+ years ago are no longer acceptable - and more important - no longer honorable when you take that word literally.

And also as I have said multiple times, if you wish to honor him for being a standout in his times - for his civil war activities, feel free to do so, but do so on your own dime, on your own property - not mine.

Last edited by blktoptrvl; 08-16-2017 at 01:06 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-16-2017, 01:01 PM
NCN
 
Location: NC/SC Border Patrol
21,663 posts, read 25,634,295 times
Reputation: 24375
Quote:
Originally Posted by CCbaxter View Post
Why can't the right understand that the president is supped to represent all Americans not just the 30% or so that voted for him.
I would say he understands that better than you do. You want him to represent everybody except the ones who voted for him. Anyone who is an American citizen is supposed to be represented by him but they voted for him because of his policies. You can't expect him to start thinking like the person we didn't vote for.

What's lost on many of you is that even David Duke as a person should have his respect. We don't have to agree with a person in order to treat them with respect. I worked for the public more than 28 years and came to realize that a person who came through the door should be treated just as another person who came through the door that I agree with politically. Each one had a right to gain the knowledge I was capable of giving and they were free not to treat me in the same way. It is called being a professional. I was being paid to do a particular job. I left my feelings at home. I am retired now and say what I please but boy, I earned my retirement. Most of the people I served had no idea what my politics is, nor did my boss. It was none of their business.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:45 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top