I'm of the generation who came of age amid the unrest of the late Sixties, and I can speak from experience that the people advocating for "progressivism"/Liberalism had a lot more heroes/martyrs back then:
Martin Luther King and Robert Kennedy were the most prominent, but there was Medgar Evers, Viola Liuzzo and a number of acolytes.
Not to forget Goodman/Schwenner/Chaney (
Mississippi Burning), the four demonstrators killed at Kent State, and the three at Jackson State.
But these individuals, with the exception of the two prominent public figures and two Kent State students probably felled by stray bullets, were all self-styled "activists" and with the exception of the two national figures, had little or no prominence.
In comparison, only one person -- Heather Hyer -- can be clearly categorized as a fallen hero of the Left, or a deliberate target of the "organized" so-called right wing in recent years (Yes, Lefties, I'm aware of Dylan Roof, but Roof acted alone and without deliberate and/or direct provocation of any kind).
The point I seek to make here is that Antifa, or at least some of its leadership
needs victims and martyrs to fire up its mostly young (and impressionable) potential following.
And this is really nothing new; I can recall seeing flyers for "Attica Brigade" -- a group which advocated confrontation, in my own undergraduate days. The campus conservative groups countered with an explanation of the "martyrdom strategy". (And in fairness, the possibility of personal harm was admitted by the "recruiters"); campus conservatives usually countered with an examination of the "strategy of martyrdom".
https://www.marxists.org/history/ero...a-brigade.html
Guess they just don't make martyrs (and suckers) like that as easily as they did back then.