Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-23-2017, 07:48 PM
 
1,728 posts, read 3,125,984 times
Reputation: 1472

Advertisements

The Liar-in-Chief is about to review details on his transgender ban....

If you recall he tweeted about his weeks ago and now he's ready to implement it. Nice way of taking our minds away from Charlottesville and his recent spat with the Repugs. Looks like another case for the SCOTUS is in the making...

White House to brief Pentagon on transgender ban details: report | TheHill

"The Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday that a White House memo will direct the Defense Department on details related to Trump's intention to bar transgender people from being admitted to the military.

Under the new policy, Defense Secretary James Mattis would have to consider a service member's ability to deploy in deciding whether to remove them from the military.

Trump announced via Twitter last month that he would reinstate a ban on transgender military service that was lifted last year under former President Barack Obama.

The president said at the time that he had made the determination after consulting with his "generals and military expert." The announcement, however, reportedly took Pentagon officials by surprise. Several members of the military openly opposed the decision. "
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-23-2017, 08:01 PM
 
Location: Gone
25,231 posts, read 16,938,118 times
Reputation: 5932
Quote:
Originally Posted by kimchee View Post
The Liar-in-Chief is about to review details on his transgender ban....

If you recall he tweeted about his weeks ago and now he's ready to implement it. Nice way of taking our minds away from Charlottesville and his recent spat with the Repugs. Looks like another case for the SCOTUS is in the making...

White House to brief Pentagon on transgender ban details: report | TheHill

"The Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday that a White House memo will direct the Defense Department on details related to Trump's intention to bar transgender people from being admitted to the military.

Under the new policy, Defense Secretary James Mattis would have to consider a service member's ability to deploy in deciding whether to remove them from the military.

Trump announced via Twitter last month that he would reinstate a ban on transgender military service that was lifted last year under former President Barack Obama.

The president said at the time that he had made the determination after consulting with his "generals and military expert." The announcement, however, reportedly took Pentagon officials by surprise. Several members of the military openly opposed the decision. "
We shall see, Tweets are not policy and so far he has done nothing, busy golfing and holding "feel good" rallies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2017, 09:58 PM
 
121 posts, read 132,907 times
Reputation: 116
"Military Transgender Ban to Begin Within 6 Months, Memo Says", according to NY Times.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2017, 10:15 PM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
39,228 posts, read 27,603,964 times
Reputation: 16067
Quote:
Originally Posted by kimchee View Post

"The Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday that a White House memo will direct the Defense Department on details related to Trump's intention to bar transgender people from being admitted to the military.

Under the new policy, Defense Secretary James Mattis would have to consider a service member's ability to deploy in deciding whether to remove them from the military.
"
and the problem is what exactly?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2017, 10:40 PM
 
1,728 posts, read 3,125,984 times
Reputation: 1472
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilyflower3191981 View Post
and the problem is what exactly?
Let me spell it out for you:

The majority of Americans want transgender folks to serve and his generals are NOT in favor of this ban. By moving forward with the ban anyway, Trump has ignored most Americans and his generals and will create unnecessary chaos...

Why is that? Perhaps it has to do with rolling back more of what Obama did? He's so hell bent on reversing all that Obama did that he could care less about a group that he claims to support - the LGBTQ... Yes, transgenders fall into that group.

Does that spell out the problem enough for you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2017, 10:42 PM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
39,228 posts, read 27,603,964 times
Reputation: 16067
Quote:
Originally Posted by kimchee View Post
Let me spell it out for you:

The majority of Americans want transgender folks to serve and his generals are NOT in favor of this ban. By moving forward with the ban anyway, Trump has ignored most Americans and his generals and will create unnecessary chaos...

Why is that? Perhaps it has to do with rolling back more of what Obama did? He's so hell bent on reversing all that Obama did that he could care less about a group that he claims to support - the LGBTQ... Yes, transgenders fall into that group.

Does that spell out the problem enough for you?
No. Not really.

Under the new policy, Defense Secretary James Mattis would have to consider a service member's ability to deploy in deciding whether to remove them from the military.
It (bold) is the way it Supposed to Be. Like it or not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2017, 10:48 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
4,488 posts, read 1,643,365 times
Reputation: 4136
Why did Trump get involved with this anyway? There was no problem at all with Transgendered people in the military. Was the religious right pressuring him or something? This president is out of touch with everything!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2017, 10:57 PM
 
Location: Missouri
1,875 posts, read 1,326,847 times
Reputation: 3117
Liberalism.....

find a cure...

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-23-2017, 11:05 PM
 
Location: North of Canada, but not the Arctic
21,135 posts, read 19,714,475 times
Reputation: 25661
I would support a ban on taxpayer funded sex change operations, but why shouldn't a transgendered person be allowed to fight if they are able to? If we ever had to reinstate the draft, dodgers could just claim they are transgendered.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2017, 12:04 AM
 
10,553 posts, read 9,650,086 times
Reputation: 4784
There are an estimated 15,000 transgender individuals serving in the military -- true patriots serving our country, unlike Trump who dodged the draft because of "heel spurs." What is his intention? to just boot all these current military troops out?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:32 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top