Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Because they are allegations that will never be substantiated. Why would you keep talking about them nonstop in light of this, especially given our country's system of law where you are presumed INNOCENT until proven otherwise by a court of law? I do note, however, that, unlike Bubba and Weinstein, Trump never paid any women off to keep them quiet, which further makes me doubt the claims against him. Still, if you're going to go down that route, yes, Bill Clinton is fair game as he continues to be paraded around as an elder statesman for the Dems (he was the keynote at the 2012 convention, for instance) and Hillary publicly stated that he would've played an important, public role in her administration. But, yet, the left was silent about that? Hmm.
Because they are allegations that will never be substantiated. Why would you keep talking about them nonstop in light of this, especially given our country's system of law where you are presumed INNOCENT until proven otherwise by a court of law? I do note, however, that unlike Bubba and Weinstein Trump never paid any women off to keep them quiet, which further makes me doubt the claims against him. Still, if you're going to go down that route, yes, Bill Clinton is fair game as he continues to be paraded around as an elder statesman for the Dems (he was the keynote at the 2012 convention, for instance) and Hillary publicly stated that he would've played an important, public role in her administration. But, yet, the left was silent about that? Hmm.
Because once the election was decided, the complainants themselves completely disappeared, as there was nothing to their charges in the first place, other than as a diversionary election tactic.
Trump seems unlikely to me, but it's possible? It smells fishy that a Democratic party operative had to organize these women and present them the night before the debate. Felt more like a political hit job, or diversion, than legitimate complaints. Also, unlike Clinton, those women waited well over a decade in some cases and never said a word. In more than one case, the women continued to work and socialize with Trump afterward. The one woman was shown in emails she sent to Trump begging him to come to the opening of her restaurant and asking him if he'd consider investing in her future endeavors. Hardly seemed like a woman traumatized by sexual harassment.
Last edited by Ibginnie; 10-09-2017 at 04:17 PM..
Reason: edited quoted post and reply
Because once the election was decided, the complainants themselves completely disappeared, as there was nothing to their charges in the first place, other than as a diversionary election tactic.
And now you know.
Slimy dems threw their atomic bomb/Hail Mary just a few weeks before the election and STILL lost. Gonna be incredibly hard to beat Trump in 2020 when you've already threw the kitchen sink at him and it's much harder to shock people.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
