Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
^^Complete and total lies - all of it.
Since when does 2% become 20%? Russia NEVER took control of 20% of US uranium - not in any way, shape or form. Or is it your agenda to intentionally spew lies and destroy this country? Appears so.
Try reading.
You read that entire post and ONE thing you take exception with is the % of uranium?
You read that entire post and ONE thing you take exception with is the % of uranium?
Because that's the reality. Folks are quibbling over small amts. of uranium.
]
Folks have no issue with Russia playing like kids with the election but oh no -- don't have less than 3% of the real production of uranium...no uh uh.
Wikileaks. I left the actual email for you to peruse, although you will no doubt claim it's trick photography or have us believe Wikileaks is not a trustworthy source.
No congress was not supposed to interview him this week. His attorney said just last week that she was scheduled to be on vacation in California this week (possibly next week as well?) and would then need an extra week or two to discuss his testimony with him prior to speaking in front/being grilled by congress.
Thanks for the update but Wikileaks is your only source regarding Mueller, no other media major media source covered the FBI director carrying uranium to Russia.
Funny, no mention of Russia there. FYI Russia has far more Uranium resource than the US, they do not need it, especially this type of specific product.
Thanks for the update but Wikileaks is your only source regarding Mueller, no other media major media source covered the FBI director carrying uranium to Russia.
Wikileaks is not a credible source? No one debates that Robert Mueller delivered the samples of uranium to Russia. That doesn't even seem to be in question. The fact that the MSM didn't cover it, should tell you all you need to know about the MSM.
Now to be clear, I'm not suggesting it was connected to the U1 scandal. It was a separate issue & may or may not have been nefarious. I was responding to the poster who claimed uranium wouldn't be delivered via airplane. My point is proven, that uranium absolutely could/would be delivered via airplane. Thus my Robert Mueller reference. What should make any reasonable person raise an eyebrow is: why would the Director of the FBI, a domestic law enforcement agency, be specifically requested by the Russians to make said delivery?
^^Complete and total lies - all of it.
Since when does 2% become 20%? Russia NEVER took control of 20% of US uranium - not in any way, shape or form. Or is it your agenda to intentionally spew lies and destroy this country? Appears so.
Try reading.
Oh the WaPo, nice source. I'll go with the actual US Nuclear Regulatory Commission's own estimate that U1 included “20 percent of the currently licensed uranium in-situ recovery production capacity in the U.S.”
Obama arranged for the trucking company to take it across the border to Canada, where it was then loaded on a plane and taken across the Atlantic to eastern Europe.
Oh the WaPo, nice source. I'll go with the actual US Nuclear Regulatory Commission's own estimate that U1 included “20 percent of the currently licensed uranium in-situ recovery production capacity in the U.S.”
Oh, that's rich. Do you even know what "in-situ" means? Once, again, try reading - but here is the relevant paragraph from the WaPo no less geezus h c..... it's no gd wonder this country is in trouble - people spewing baseless information all over the internet for the lazy and stupid.
Clue: Productioncapacity does NOT mean reserves. So, let's try again:
Quote:
“represent approximately 20 percent of the currently licensed uranium in-situ recovery production capacity” in the United States.
But that did not mean 20 percent of U.S. uranium reserves.
In-situ recovery (ISR) is one of two ways to obtain uranium from underground; it’s the main method in the United States. It’s generally used for low-grade ore that would be otherwise too expensive to mine. A solution is pumped into the ore deposit to dissolve the uranium.
The resulting liquid is then pumped back out, dried so it becomes “yellowcake” and placed in 55-gallon drums before it is taken to a uranium conversion facility for eventual use in a nuclear power reactor.
Moreover, the 20 percent number was a 2010 estimate that has now been overtaken by events, such as additional mining licenses being issued. The Energy Information Administration has a current list of ISR projects, and the Uranium One assets now represent much less than 20 percent production capacity because other U.S. operations have been approved.
“The NRC has licensed additional in-situ uranium facilities since the 20-percent figure was estimated (and it was an estimate),” an NRC spokesman said in an email. “Our current estimate would be closer to 10 percent.”
The spokesman added: “Note also that even the original figure does not include conventional mines, and was nowhere near saying they controlled 20 percent of U.S. uranium reserves.”
This issue is WAY TOO COMPLICATED and SCIENTIFIC for any layman to be commenting on.
Until an actual nuclear physicist can demonstrate a clear and present danger to the US by this so-called sale, I call bs on the entire issue.
Last edited by Ariadne22; 11-05-2017 at 12:58 AM..
The Uranium One scandal in perspective: Bill Clinton Received $500 K from the Putin regime, five times more than it allegedly spent on Facebook ads that the "media-Democrat complex claims swung the election away from Hillary to Donald Trump.
Here's the story that CNN, MSNBC, et al. won't tell you:
Notice that the Facebook ad buy began in June, 2015, well before Donald Trump entered the race. But Democrats never let facts get in the way of their lies. The Putin regime paid the $500 K for one speech by Bill Clinton, part of a multi-million-dollar influence peddling scheme to enrich Bill and Hillary (then Secretary of State) in order to gain their approval of the Uranium One acquisition deal.
Last edited by nononsenseguy; 11-05-2017 at 02:22 AM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'll go with the actual US Nuclear Regulatory Commission's own estimate that U1 included “20 percent of the currently licensed uranium in-situ recovery production capacity in the U.S.”
The Story CNN and MSNBC won't cover: Uranium One
