Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-06-2017, 01:01 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,884,155 times
Reputation: 14345

Advertisements

Turns out one of the people he murdered was his grandmother-in-law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-06-2017, 01:06 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,748,172 times
Reputation: 20674
Media reporting more inf on his bad conduct discharge. He assaulted his ex wife and fractured his infant son's head in 2012. He spent 12 months in military confinement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2017, 01:09 PM
 
19,722 posts, read 10,128,243 times
Reputation: 13090
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawaiiancoconut View Post
Yeah, a lot of people aren't knowledgeable about guns, and how gun legislation/bans work.

Bill Clinton pass a ban on high capacity clips (among other gun restrictions) and all that did was stop the new manufacturing of high capacity clips. People had no problem finding and buying high capacity clips during the ban that were already manufactured pre-ban. And furthermore, the Clinton gun restrictions did nothing to curb gun violence - according to ATF.
You can also buy magazine extensions that increase the capacity. I did that on one of my handguns because I have big hands and it made for a bigger grip.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2017, 01:10 PM
 
19,722 posts, read 10,128,243 times
Reputation: 13090
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
Media reporting more inf on his bad conduct discharge. He assaulted his ex wife and fractured his infant son's head in 2012. He spent 12 months in military confinement.
I am surprised he only got a BCD for that. I would have expected a DD.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2017, 01:11 PM
 
Location: 500 miles from home
33,942 posts, read 22,532,112 times
Reputation: 25816
Quote:
Originally Posted by shadowne View Post
DM was reporting multiple former classmates recently removing him from their FB due to his unhinged atheist rants. Very relevant due to the POS committing mass execution in a church. Curious why the truth makes you so uncomfortable.
Due you think he was targeting a church because he was an atheist? Or do you think he chose that church because of an ongoing dispute with his in-laws - who went to that church?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2017, 01:11 PM
 
10,553 posts, read 9,651,677 times
Reputation: 4784
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post
Media reporting more inf on his bad conduct discharge. He assaulted his ex wife and fractured his infant son's head in 2012. He spent 12 months in military confinement.
How can you beat a child's head in and receive only 12 months in jail? There's something wrong with our penalties for domestic violence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2017, 01:13 PM
 
8,391 posts, read 7,648,571 times
Reputation: 11025
Quote:
Originally Posted by j7r6s View Post
I think he was convicted of two counts of assault, not domestic violence. Most states would codify what constitutes domestic violence, but it isn't clear to me that the military code does. I'm not sure he actually was a prohibited person, though he would be had his trial been in any state court since the victims were members of his household.
According to the official Air Force Statement, he was convicted of two counts under Article 128, one count of assault on his wife and one count of assault on his son.

Here is the exact wording for Article 128 in military law:

(a) Any person subject to this chapter who attempts or offers with unlawful force or violence to do bodily harm to another person, whether or not the attempt or offer is consummated, is guilty of assault and shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

(b) Any person subject to this chapter who—

(1) commits an assault with a dangerous weapon or other means or force likely to produce death or grievous bodily harm; or

(2) commits an assault and intentionally inflicts grievous bodily harm with or without a weapon; is guilty of aggravated assault and shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

Additionally, here's what the prosecutor on the case said about the case:


“He assaulted his stepson severely enough that he fractured his skull, and he also assaulted his wife,” said Don Christensen, a retired colonel who was the chief prosecutor for the Air Force. “He pled to intentionally doing it.”


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/06/u...ley-texas.html


He has had other legal issues in the past, including something to do with an arrest for animal abuse in Colorado after he left the air force.

And, the reports from the investigating officials in Texas are that he was recently involved with additional family disputes in Texas, including sending threatening text messages to his mother in law.

(By the way, I have seen unconfirmed reports now that his ex-wife's grandmother was among those shot to death in the church. That has not yet been confirmed by officials though)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2017, 01:15 PM
 
17,401 posts, read 11,978,162 times
Reputation: 16155
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fiyero View Post
Ban on AR-15s for starters. And he got the gun legally.
So he wouldn't have used another means to shoot?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2017, 01:15 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,748,172 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
Turns out one of the people he murdered was his grandmother-in-law.
Really looking like he targeted his ex wife by proxy via her mother and grandmother, both members of this church.

Was the " Kill Bill" thing an attempt to disguise who he targeted?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2017, 01:18 PM
 
19,844 posts, read 12,106,658 times
Reputation: 17577
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
Due you think he was targeting a church because he was an atheist? Or do you think he chose that church because of an ongoing dispute with his in-laws - who went to that church?
I believe he chose the church in part because of his in laws. However there is a difference between being a peaceful atheist and regularly going on unhinged atheist rants. To not consider that influenced his actions is dishonest. He could have massacred the family at home. He chose to take out a congregation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:55 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top