Interesting who sets the fines of violations. Both in California and elsewhere
I.e this article
Roadshow: Tell us about your ‘dumb’ tickets – The Mercury News
Legalized extortion for such high fines for a $2 light rail fare. Yet they enforce it so little that real cheaters know how to avoid those five inspectors on the line.
Interesting when you want to lure people to ride the train to reduce traffic congestion. A confused commuter who are dinged by such a fine would probably never ride it again and tell others not to as well.
In the case of heavy rail commuter trains wouldn't it be better if you have gates or platform "loaders" at busier stations, and the conductor to handle tickets at less busier stations, maybe with a surcharge for stations with staffed ticket sales.
Though fortunately for other transit agencies around the state i.e LA metro, SF muni, and most recently BART the fine is set at a much more reasonable $75-$125 which is still steep for such violation but much lower than VTA's or Caltrain's fine.
its interesting that BART would adopt proof of fare in 2018 when fares are not collected at entering the system but upon exiting. Cheaters mostly cheat when they exit the system so just because they have a BART ticket or clipper card doesn't mean they won't cheat when the agent is looking the other way as they leave.
Though when you compare that a toll facility violation is $25 for a first time penalty in most jurisdictions in California and $70 for not paying it and that a failure to pay parking fee violation is about $40-$67 in most cities in CA. The system is unduly harsh on those trying to save the environment at the same time try to confuse them with confusing rule that various alot from system to system.
In practice the fine for transit related violations should never be higher than 50 times the fare. This is the rule in most parts of the world aside from very serious violations.
So who sets who high or low fines are anyways? It doesn't always match the seriousness of the violation?