Jeff Sessions...the "I don't recall" Attorney General

[chucksnee]

Originally Posted by moneill

The first hearing I think we all understood and kind of thought okay - he doesn't remember.

Then when the second time came and he knew kind of what was going to be said and then he continued the charade -- didn't even seem to try and 'recall' the past...meh -- okay -- let's just say -- not a big deal.

Third time around -- not only did he conveniently forget some stuff -- he managed to recall that although he can't remember how or why -- he gave good advice.

WHAT?!

Did Hillary Clinton get called three times about something and each time -- as evidence had been released have to adjust her testimony to say -- oh yeah -- I remembered AFTER that came out....I don't honestly remember.

AND EVEN IF SHE DID...does that make it okay for Session to do that?

no. And right now - -we are talking about him.

Yes, we are talking about moore, however, the left gave Hillary a pass...at least 2 times she did it while being asked questions...


And no because Hillary did it does no make sessions o.k. to do that, of course not, but s we can see, it's o.k. for the left but not the right....

[moneill]

Originally Posted by nononsenseguy

I for one would sure like to know the truth about Behghazi. Why didn't she provide the security that was asked for? That was her job! Why did she blame the attack on a video? Why did she lie to the victims parents and tell them she would make sure the video creator was punished? Who gave the "stand down" order (I know this is disputed, but those involved who were ready to go tell a different story).

Nothing Hillary says can be believed. She is a known liar.

There is sufficient information online to address each of your concerns.

BUT -- it doens't matter -- you won't be satisfied no matter what is written, found out, stated.

That's the reality.

[Ted Bear]

Originally Posted by rbohm

words mean things people, and context also means things as well.

Which is why social media at 140 characters is so dangerous. There is no context, no emotion, no inflection.

Originally Posted by zzzSnorlax

I know, "I don't recall." IS a pretty s*** defense isn't it?

Actually, it is the perfect defense. How can u challenge someone who says they don't recall? We know they are generally lying, but how do you prove that without taking a very large and circuitous route through many people to get to the truth?


We all hate it, but in a way it is perfect. You can't challenge what is, or is not, in my mind.


Albeit, in the end, the truth will out. Just not from the person being interrogated.