Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Wonder what the future holds for America based on the incredible birth rates in many poor cities.
Wonder who is going to pay for all the baby boomers Social Security and Medicare when the poor are the ones having tremendous third-world birth rates while the upper-middle class and wealthy families that could ensure Social Security and Medicare solvency have the extremely low birth rates.
They say in future only two workers for each social security and medicare recipients. But the future workers are overwhelmingly born to poor families who are just producing future criminals and drug dealers and not rich ones who can ensure the future solvency of the country.
Seems like poor, liberal cities are nothing but baby factories with liberal politicians advocating for poor women who can hardly take care of themselves to have as many babies as possible to ensure future Democratic voters.
I just did some research.
liberal San Bernadino City, CA which is a very failed city that was just in bankruptcy has 32% of the population under 18 years old compared to Republican, conservative and rich Newport Beach with 17%
liberal, Democratic Phoenix has 28% of the population under 18 years compared to wealthy, affluent and rich Scottsdale with 17% of the population under 18 years old.
Many of these liberal big cities filled with illegal aliens and those following the Democrats dreams of having as many babies as they can maximize welfare benefits to have nearly twice amount of under 18 population and birth rates of welfare families who should be the ones having the children.
Unlike in the good old days, seems like now its a game with lots of poor women to get pregnant with as many parolees, drug dealers and illegal aliens as possible. Democrats love it because they really think these staggering birth rates will ensure future voters, so that they can ultimately turn America into the socialist utopia of their dreams.
It seems like in general that the under 18 population tends to be around twice as much per-capita in poor cities as opposed to rich ones.
The lower birth rates in general seem to be mainly in upper-middle class and wealthy areas while the poor just have baby after baby after baby.
Basically, the primary demographic that is having babies is just having future criminals and future welfare queens and kings that will come of age in the 2030s and 2040s when the baby boomers need good, solid workers with lots of income to collect to ensure the solvency of social security and medicare
Last edited by lovecrowds; 01-08-2018 at 12:30 AM..
For reference, San Francisco has 13.4% of the population below 18.
Surely, this is a poorly executed assessment. Basic education would help identify meaningful trends.
I am not a liberal, but I think it is 100% wonderful that cities like San Francisco, Seattle and Scottsdale price out the poor families and the only ones that can stay are those on section 8.
Section 8 housing for families is nothing more than a license to have baby after baby after baby and with millions of families getting massive housing vouchers because they can't stop having baby after baby.
It is because of section 8 that in the 2030s and 2040s the main generation of taxpaying citizens will be those from multi-generational welfare queens and kings. Rather than the majority of wealthy having children, it's those on EITC welfare, section 8 and WIC who are having third-world birth rates.
The best way to ensure Social Security and Medicare solvency is to give the rich welfare to have children and to eliminate welfare for EITC, WIC, Section 8 families.
I am not a liberal, but I think it is 100% wonderful that cities like San Francisco, Seattle and Scottsdale price out the poor families and the only ones that can stay are those on section 8.
Section 8 housing for families is nothing more than a license to have baby after baby after baby and with millions of families getting massive housing vouchers because they can't stop having baby after baby.
It is because of section 8 that in the 2030s and 2040s the main generation of taxpaying citizens will be those from multi-generational welfare queens and kings. Rather than the majority of wealthy having children, it's those on EITC welfare, section 8 and WIC who are having third-world birth rates.
The best way to ensure Social Security and Medicare solvency is to give the rich welfare to have children and to eliminate welfare for EITC, WIC, Section 8 families.
You are quite delusional.
Section 8 vouchers are funded by the Government and currently there is a huge backlog for applicants that can be a few years long in some states due to lack of funding.
By the way Section 8 housing doesn't mean people will be housed in poor conditions.
It's based on local rental rates.
Where do you get the idea that Section 8 promotes "families is nothing more than a license to have baby after baby after baby"?
People will have babies regardless of their housing conditions.
The poorer a person is, the more he/she will tend to procreate.This seems to be a trait of human nature, as this has been observable all over the world.
The poorer a person is, the more he/she will tend to procreate.This seems to be a trait of human nature, as this has been observable all over the world.
Proof positive that poor people are inherently stupid.
Wonder what the future holds for America based on the incredible birth rates in many poor cities.
Wonder who is going to pay for all the baby boomers Social Security and Medicare when the poor are the ones having tremendous third-world birth rates while the upper-middle class and wealthy families that could ensure Social Security and Medicare solvency have the extremely low birth rates.
They say in future only two workers for each social security and medicare recipients. But the future workers are overwhelmingly born to poor families who are just producing future criminals and drug dealers and not rich ones who can ensure the future solvency of the country.
Seems like poor, liberal cities are nothing but baby factories with liberal politicians advocating for poor women who can hardly take care of themselves to have as many babies as possible to ensure future Democratic voters.
I just did some research.
liberal San Bernadino City, CA which is a very failed city that was just in bankruptcy has 32% of the population under 18 years old compared to Republican, conservative and rich Newport Beach with 17%
liberal, Democratic Phoenix has 28% of the population under 18 years compared to wealthy, affluent and rich Scottsdale with 17% of the population under 18 years old.
Many of these liberal big cities filled with illegal aliens and those following the Democrats dreams of having as many babies as they can maximize welfare benefits to have nearly twice amount of under 18 population and birth rates of welfare families who should be the ones having the children.
Unlike in the good old days, seems like now its a game with lots of poor women to get pregnant with as many parolees, drug dealers and illegal aliens as possible. Democrats love it because they really think these staggering birth rates will ensure future voters, so that they can ultimately turn America into the socialist utopia of their dreams.
It seems like in general that the under 18 population tends to be around twice as much per-capita in poor cities as opposed to rich ones.
The lower birth rates in general seem to be mainly in upper-middle class and wealthy areas while the poor just have baby after baby after baby.
Basically, the primary demographic that is having babies is just having future criminals and future welfare queens and kings that will come of age in the 2030s and 2040s when the baby boomers need good, solid workers with lots of income to collect to ensure the solvency of social security and medicare
I know what's gong to happen, I've seen the movie...Idiocracy
Proof positive that poor people are inherently stupid.
Why they are poor.
We can compare brain pans if you want. Hit me with a DM so as to avoid off topic posts in the thread if you're interested.
Or you can just keep calling me stupid, simply because I'm poor.
Which will it be?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
