Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Media? what about a hysterical corey booker going rogue on Nielsen. that guy needs a psych exam.
It was awesome! And she sat there like a deer in headlights: derr, err, sputter sputter. Freakin idiot. She & every single con deserve the beat down they get.
Hmm. Could the media be treating these two women differently because of the letter next to their name?
In other news, water is wet.
Sadly we have not had a professional journalistic standard of neutrality since the 1960's when leftist started to infiltrate the business. I said business instead of profession, because many a professional journalist endevoured to separate their own personal feelings and ideology from their obligation to report the news unbiasedly.
Guys like Tim Russart (who was clearly left leaning) did a very good job or separation of his personal views vs. reporting neutrality, even if it made his side of the coin look bad.
Today about the only person I can think fits the bill is Sheryl Attkisson, and CBS parted ways with her as a result.
The bottom line for those ignorant of American history as it pertains to the MSM, is that they are leftist, and getting more so.
The Founding Fathers wanted, no insisted, on a free press to insure our Republic was to survive. Little did they envision that the corruption of the press would come from within, rather than outwardly from the current government authority.
Sure, we as free citizens want and expect that our press/media will not be controlled by the government like is the case with leftist regimes based on socialism, fascism and communism. However an abdication of neutrality from within can be as bad, if not worse than an insidious coup from within.
It was awesome! And she sat there like a deer in headlights: derr, err, sputter sputter. Freakin idiot. She & every single con deserve the beat down they get.
She looked so bored I thought she was going to yawn.
Hmm. Could the media be treating these two women differently because of the letter next to their name?
Could you please post some actual evidence that these two women were treated massively different? And by which media personnel?
Of course, I don't see how the woman with the apparent amnesia today who said that she only heard "tough language" but didn't remember specifically what was said (lololololol), is comparable to the Congress member.
But since you do, could you post some real proof of that claim, and not some obscure Twitter user's opinion? Please be specific. Thanks!
It was awesome! And she sat there like a deer in headlights: derr, err, sputter sputter. Freakin idiot. She & every single con deserve the beat down they get.
She obviously wants to keep her job enough to lie. Unfortunately, she was not a very good liar--nobody really believed her.
On the other hand, maybe she is so used to President Vulgarian and the bile he spews that those types of things bounce right off of her bureaucratic little head.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
