Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I'm sure it will just be "locker room razzing". The base seems to enjoy threatening folks, it was cheered and applauded during a lot of his campaign rallies.
Exactly. Trump's supporters will excuse it. He knows that himself and openly bragged about it.
I'm sure it will just be "locker room razzing". The base seems to enjoy threatening folks, it was cheered and applauded during a lot of his campaign rallies.
But that's the thing: talk it talk, unless it transforms into something real and physical.
Behaving like a ruthless mobster might have helped him run the organization, stiffling multiple contractors and lenders. But actually threatening another person is little different.
If Trump physically threatened Stormy Daniels through Michael Cohen, he needs to go
And if it turns out that he didn't threaten anybody, the fanatical Trump-haters will "insert next excuse here" and insist that's the reason President Trump should go.
Is this from a neutral concerned citizen, or a partisan liberal who is ideologically driven by TDS?
The fact this person who sells her body and sex for money is even given media coverage is bad enough, and is also driven by the liberal MSM because they oppose Trump. Yet many a scandal with liberal/leftist politicians over the decades have been ignored or covered up.
That is not journalism, and so called journalists cannot pick and choose when to flip on their investigative natures and adversarial roles with government, depending on whether they ideologically agree or disagree with the politician in question.
Trump is not going anywhere, especially not based on some salacious accusations coming from what is essentially a prostitute who lacks integrity. There might be things I do not care for with politicians, but I would take their word over a person like this.
Sooo...once again, Trump supporters ridicule the woman who slept with Trump but defend Trump for sleeping with her? That's an impressive pretzel to get twisted into, even for Trump supporters. Trump was married with a newborn baby. Stormy Daniels was single.
But that's the thing: talk it talk, unless it transforms into something real and physical.
Behaving like a ruthless mobster might have helped him run the organization, stiffling multiple contractors and lenders. But actually threatening another person is little different.
True, but we're also talking about a guy that said he'd pay the legal fees for an attendee that sucker punched another attendee at a campaign rally.
Is this from a neutral concerned citizen, or a partisan liberal who is ideologically driven by TDS?
The fact this person who sells her body and sex for money is even given media coverage is bad enough, and is also driven by the liberal MSM because they oppose Trump. Yet many a scandal with liberal/leftist politicians over the decades have been ignored or covered up.
That is not journalism, and so called journalists cannot pick and choose when to flip on their investigative natures and adversarial roles with government, depending on whether they ideologically agree or disagree with the politician in question.
Trump is not going anywhere, especially not based on some salacious accusations coming from what is essentially a prostitute who lacks integrity. There might be things I do not care for with politicians, but I would take their word over a person like this.
`
But these are the folks your President used to keep as company. The pics are everywhere. Why the talk of a non-disclosure agreement if none of this is true ESPECIALLY when Cohen jumps up and says he paid the hush money and it had nothing to do with Trump. I mean attorney's don't just voluntarily offer to pay anything for a client for nothing. Her being who she is (porn star) doesn't negate that fact that Trump and Cohen have had dealings with her they'd rather not get out to the public. You just chose to deny it b/c the person involved is beneath your moral / ethical standards.
Now the Repub talking point is, "who cares about consensual sex?" That's a full 180 from when Bill Clinton was in office.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
