Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-30-2018, 04:36 PM
 
Location: Virginia
1,743 posts, read 992,576 times
Reputation: 1768

Advertisements

"I WANT TO BELIEVE-e-e-e!!!"

Quote:
Democrats have objected vociferously to publishing the memo, claiming that it paints an inaccurate picture of reality, based on incomplete information.

Among the criticisms mounted by Democrats in recent days is the accusation that the GOP-authored document isn't factually accurate.

Fox News chief intelligence correspondent Catherine Herridge, who first revealed that FBI Director Christopher Wray viewed the memo on Sunday, is reporting today that several FBI/DOJ sources have now viewed the controversial missive and are not questioning its accuracy:

Two Senior FBI officials have now reviewed the Republican staff memo, alleging abuses of government surveillance programs during the 2016 election, a source familiar with the matter tells Fox News, adding that the officials “could not point to any factual inaccuracies.”— Pat Ward (@WardDPatrick) January 30, 2018
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/guyben...-memo-n2441862
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-30-2018, 04:37 PM
 
45,676 posts, read 24,024,933 times
Reputation: 15559
Quote:
Originally Posted by claymoore View Post
Yeah that's what Fox is reporting but the FBI has not issued a formal statement yet.

Waiting......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2018, 04:40 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,380,515 times
Reputation: 17261
It does not take a factual inaccuracy to create a misleading document.

Remember, us Americans nuked two cities, killing thousands of civilians in the most horrible way possible. Women and children died screaming.

That is a factually accurate statement. But fairly misleading, in that it leaves out that it avoided even larger causalities, and we were at war.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2018, 04:41 PM
 
Location: Long Island
8,840 posts, read 4,807,524 times
Reputation: 6479
How many on the committee have actually read all the intelligence behind this? Has Nunes?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2018, 04:43 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,380,515 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnOurWayHome View Post
How many on the committee have actually read all the intelligence behind this? Has Nunes?
According to Schiff, Nunes has not read the underlying material.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2018, 04:44 PM
 
Location: In The Thin Air
12,566 posts, read 10,622,240 times
Reputation: 9247
I am still waiting to hear Alex Jones' opinion on it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2018, 05:06 PM
 
27,655 posts, read 16,142,781 times
Reputation: 19077
I’m just still waiting to see it
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2018, 05:15 PM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,380,515 times
Reputation: 17261
Quote:
Originally Posted by saltine View Post
I’m just still waiting to see it
I think it will be 4 more days, although it depends on how you interpret the rules on it. I *believe* Trump could release it immediately if he wanted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2018, 05:21 PM
 
Location: United States
12,390 posts, read 7,100,577 times
Reputation: 6135
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
According to Schiff, Nunes has not read the underlying material.
Schiff also said the memo was full of inaccuracies.

Schiff has absolutely no credibility.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-30-2018, 05:30 PM
 
Location: Salisbury,NC
16,759 posts, read 8,218,912 times
Reputation: 8537
Quote:
Originally Posted by claymoore View Post
Sounds like fake news.

The GOP guys on Intell. have said its not what a lot of the people, having wet dreams over it, think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:08 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top