Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I do. Trump supporters would find a way to support it. Studies show the vast majority of Trump supporters support him no matter what he does because its a support coming from the gut.
This shows just how little you know about Trump supporters.
Why not just ban guns altogether and implement a confiscation program? Trump supporters will support Trump no matter what, and he'd be a hero among many on the left.
Better yet, ban Hollywood movies, heavy metal music, rap music and social media.
Our Trump makes great compromise at the expense of his own base to help stop more gun deaths. The bump stock is not even am arm; it’s a modification that makes guns more like those automatic weapons that are already illegal.
I don't think I saw the words "bump stock" in the 2nd amendment. Did I miss it?
Freedom was designed for a moral society, not the insane asylum of today. Therefore, the founders put no restrictions on bearing arms. Society has deteriorated so much now that you have to strip their rights away to manage the chaos. Russia is laughing and no doubt waiting. A disarmed America is defenseless.
How so? 2nd mentions keep & bear, nothing about modify.
burdell is right.
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar
Its going to take a act of congress. I think proposing new laws is about the most he can do to be honest. And even then, the second amendment is a right. not a law, or suggestion.
Would be good to get rid of the NRA organized ban on the CDC collecting data as well so that GOOD decisions can be made, not just knee jerk ones.
In the end, I think it will take a new amendment to change things. And im not sure how I feel about that.
banning bump stocks would not take an act of congress, just a rule change at the BATF. that was all it took to make them legal during the obama administration.
as for the CDC, leave them out of the gun control mix, they are not here for that. they are here to research diseases, not guns.
i agree it will take a new amendment that repeals the second amendment, and replaces it. we must be careful what we ask for if we go down that road, we may just get it.
in the end we already have tens of thousands of gun control laws on the books, why not tart actually enforcing the ones we already have?
Quote:
Originally Posted by PCALMike
Why not just ban guns altogether and implement a confiscation program? Trump supporters will support Trump no matter what, and he'd be a hero among many on the left.
no trump supporters wont support him on that, and neither will a lot of democrats.
---
President Donald Trump said Tuesday he's ordered Attorney General Jeff Sessions to propose rules on banning so-called bump stocks. Trump made the comments at a White House event, following the mass school shooting in Florida last week. Trump will host families and law enforcement later this week to discuss steps to strengthen school safety.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
