Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-19-2018, 09:34 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,634,918 times
Reputation: 18521

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey View Post
Claiming, 10 years after the fact, that "I believed Sandy Hook happened" will do nothing for him here. His goose is indeed cooked. The statements at the time speak for themselves. Actual malice and huge punitive damages against him personally. He had better settle and settle fast because he will never be able to pay the judgment no matter how many taint wipes he sells.
Exaggerate much? Is this 2022?
Jone set the record straight years ago.
You people going off hearsay on the issue, are making some bold statements, that don't fit what actually occurred.

 
Old 04-19-2018, 09:34 AM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
39,228 posts, read 27,611,062 times
Reputation: 16068
I used to found Alex Jones to be "well... interesting".

But now, I feel he is nothing but a troll. It seems to me that he is only interested in one thing; scamming enough people into believing his conspiracy theories so they will send him more money.

He’s found a business model that works. However, I think this time, he crossed the line.
 
Old 04-19-2018, 09:35 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,634,918 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey View Post
This is written by someone who appears to know even less about the law than they do about the distinction between "retract" and "redact". Redacting/retracting an article (which Jones has not done) is not a defense to a defamation with malice claim, nevermind "meeting legal obligations" which isn't a legal standard and seems like something someone whose legal experience is gleaned from the back of a box of Apple Jacks would say. Anti-SLAPP isn't going to apply here, not even close.

I wish you could be Alex Jones's lawyer. Honest to God, I do.
Why?
 
Old 04-19-2018, 09:37 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,634,918 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24 View Post
And since I know damn well that you did watch, when was any of this redacted?

Again, if it was redacted, how did anyone, including you, know about any of this content?
Show starts in 20 minutes... I catch Alex daily and have for years. He use to be on the local Access Channel 10, back in the 90's and into Bush's reign.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXdCJZAkpv8
 
Old 04-19-2018, 09:38 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,634,918 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by PullMyFinger View Post
I hope they win and break him financially.
You cannot go after his sponsors, I see?
 
Old 04-19-2018, 09:39 AM
 
9,254 posts, read 3,587,882 times
Reputation: 4852
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Why?
Because I would love to see him taken to the financial cleaners. And the employment of the arguments you are making would hasten that occurrence.

Last edited by CaseyB; 04-19-2018 at 10:42 AM.. Reason: off topic
 
Old 04-19-2018, 09:40 AM
 
Location: Virginia
10,093 posts, read 6,436,538 times
Reputation: 27661
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Show starts in 20 minutes... I catch Alex daily and have for years. He use to be on the local Access Channel 10, back in the 90's and into Bush's reign.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXdCJZAkpv8
Oh, I fully believe you've watched Alex for years. I would imagine that your television has him on as background noise 24/7. That would pretty much explain the tenor of most of your posts.
 
Old 04-19-2018, 09:40 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,634,918 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey View Post
Read this slowly so you understand, or if you get distracted because you need to sound out the words, find someone who can explain it to you in the most simplistic of terms:

Editing an article after-the-fact is not an affirmative defense to a claim for defamation with malice.

Again, just so it sinks in:

Editing an article after-the-fact is not an affirmative defense to a claim for defamation with malice.

You said it was a quote, not I.

A quote is taken from the whole. an edit.
 
Old 04-19-2018, 09:41 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,634,918 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bungalove View Post
"Redacted"

I do not think that word means what you think it does.
OK. Did it make it hard to figure out?
 
Old 04-19-2018, 09:44 AM
 
9,254 posts, read 3,587,882 times
Reputation: 4852
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
You said it was a quote, not I.

A quote is taken from the whole. an edit.
This is a bunch of gobbledygook.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:06 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top