Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Just give Trump the Nobel Peace prize, already. Obama got one and he did nothing to earn it so its not like these awards are as prestigious as they used to be. I can't complain, I'm looking at a Pulitzer Prize I won for one of my posts on this forum.
I think they are hiding right now is because of the old saying....."Obama's and Kerry's chickens have come home to roost". If they would be proud of their accomplishment then they would be loving the limelight. Its who they are.
Where is Obama and Kerry?
They should be defending the truth about the nuclear deal and how it is working. They should not let this type of information be left unaddressed.
What did Bibi expose?
According to many experts he didn't tell anyone anything they hadn't heard/seen years ago:
"It was largely described in a 2007 National Intelligence Estimate, which said that U.S. spies "judge with high confidence that in fall 2003, Tehran halted its nuclear weapons program."
...
"It's nothing new," Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., told Bloomberg Television. "This is really not groundbreaking — we've known of this for some time.""
This is just typical Bibi, trying to get attention and deflect from his own troubles at home.
"Israeli police on Feb. 13 recommended that the 68-year-old,four-term prime minister be indicted for bribery in two cases. On Friday [March 1, 2018], he was questioned in connection with a third investigation."
Where is Obama and Kerry?
They should be defending the truth about the nuclear deal and how it is working. They should not let this type of information be left unaddressed.
If they were "speaking up", you'd be all over them for sticking their noses into an issue that no longer concerns them.
Where is Obama and Kerry?
They should be defending the truth about the nuclear deal and how it is working. They should not let this type of information be left unaddressed.
You missed the part about those documents being from years ago before the Iran nuclear deal.
If they were "speaking up", you'd be all over them for sticking their noses into an issue that no longer concerns them.
As I said before, ex politicians have no obligation to speak about anything. However, these two stooges should be held accountable for the Iran deal. It has put us more at risk, just like their illegal alien scheme to bring whomever into this country. They are both criminals. Put Holder, and Lynch in there as well. They should be speaking in a court room.
Where is Obama and Kerry?
They should be defending the truth about the nuclear deal and how it is working. They should not let this type of information be left unaddressed.
How many threads are you people going to start on this?
Iran doesn't have a nuclear weapons program.
Even if they did, you fail to understand that Iran has no weapons grade Plutonium, and no means of producing weapons grade Plutonium.
That means Iran is limited to using only Uranium-235, enriched to at least 95%.
Even in this day and age, the physics of nuclear weapons is such that a 20 kt nuclear warhead using U-235 enriched to 95% would be the same size and weight as Little Boy.
At just under 10,000 pounds, Iran currently has no missiles capable of mounting a warhead that large, and no aircraft capable of carrying a single 10,000 pound bomb.
You think Pakistan has 1 megaton warheads? They don't.
Pakistan has only enriched U-235 to use as nuclear warheads. The have no missiles than can deliver a 20 kt warhead, and the only aircraft that possibly could, their B-57G bombers, they removed from their inventory in the 1980s, because they couldn't get the parts to keep them flying.
Pakistan's nuclear weapons are a handful of 5 kt gravity bombs delivered by very old Mirage 5 aircraft, and mostly 1 kt and less than 1 kt warheads that can be mounted on a short-range missile or fired from 203 mm tube artillery and those are for the express purpose of repelling an advancing Indian army.
It's not like Pakistan will be launching nukes at Israel or the US, because they cannot.
If you thought Iran would be fabricating high yield nuclear warheads, you thought wrong.
Iran still has a number of operational US-built F-4 Phantom IIs. They might be able to modify them to carry a 5 kt gravity bomb on the center hard-point on the fuselage. Aside from that, their nuclear weapons would be very low yield, and their primary use would be to repel invaders.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerLily24
What did Bibi expose?
According to many experts he didn't tell anyone anything they hadn't heard/seen years ago:
"It was largely described in a 2007 National Intelligence Estimate, which said that U.S. spies "judge with high confidence that in fall 2003, Tehran halted its nuclear weapons program."
...
"It's nothing new," Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., told Bloomberg Television. "This is really not groundbreaking — we've known of this for some time.""
They knew that for some time, because Iran voluntarily approached the Bush Administration, I believe it was February of 2002.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I get it!
